http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56825
--- Comment #4 from Evgeny Televitckiy 2013-04-04
06:41:38 UTC ---
Ye, I thought it was something along those lines. Thanks for the clarification,
now I understand the reason why this paragraph appear in standard.
Yet, appealing to the end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56825
--- Comment #2 from Evgeny Televitckiy 2013-04-03
09:09:22 UTC ---
A small correction.
Lines:
But if we use more complicate:
USE_E3_ARG_R(5, USE_E3_ARG_R(6, 7));
It expands to:
(USE_E3_ARG_W(9, 0), 8, 8);
Should be changed to:
But
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56825
--- Comment #1 from Evgeny Televitckiy 2013-04-03
09:05:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 29787
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29787
Preprocessor result
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56825
Bug #: 56825
Summary: Preprocessor does not expand macro correctly if it is
an argument and argument of a macro contains ##
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Ver
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54553
--- Comment #7 from Evgeny Televitckiy 2012-09-12
10:37:33 UTC ---
Thanks.
Nice work guys!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54553
--- Comment #2 from Evgeny 2012-09-12 08:22:14 UTC ---
Well, maybe it's time to test it. :-)
(In reply to comment #1)
> This attribute is not very well tested
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54553
Bug #: 54553
Summary: atribute optimize on function affects optimization for
other functions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIR
