[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

--- Comment #11 from stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com 2008-01-21 20:18 --- I can reproduce with gcc 4.3 snapshot 20080118 -- stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/30697] New: Local arrays not eliminated by optimization

ReportedBy: stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30697

[Bug gcov-profile/30650] [4.3 Regression] ICE with -fprofile-use

--- Comment #2 from stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com 2007-02-03 21:45 --- I'm guessing "make profiledbootstrap" fails on my machine for the same reason. (I get the same ICE). Last tested with snapshot gcc-4.3.0_alpha20070202. My platform is i386 though, not x86_6

[Bug c++/29297] New: Segmentation fault on "invalid use of `::'"

reproduce this on i386. -- Summary: Segmentation fault on "invalid use of `::'" Product: gcc Version: 3.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug c++/26099] support for type traits is not available

--- Comment #4 from stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com 2006-02-04 23:41 --- > Yes TR1 refers to the technical report which is really just the library part. For the library to provide this functionality, it has to exist in the compiler, as a whole, or by a clever combination

[Bug c++/26099] support for type traits is not available

--- Comment #2 from stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com 2006-02-04 23:13 --- When I saw "tr1" in the path, I assumed this referred to the technical report of the standards committee. I recognize a technical report is not a standard, thus I am simply inquiring if there is i

[Bug c++/26099] New: support for type traits is not available

dot deroeck at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26099

[Bug tree-optimization/19899] ICE: tree check: expected real_cst, have integer_cst in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1490 with -ftree-vectorize -msse2

--- Additional Comments From stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com 2005-06-13 19:38 --- still exists on main branch as well -- What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug tree-optimization/21998] New: (cond ? result1 : result2) is vectorized, where equivalent if-syntax isn't

dBy: stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21998

[Bug tree-optimization/21997] New: vectorization inhibited by gcc's choice to view an integer as a boolean

Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/21884] [4.1 regression] ICE with -ftree-vectorize

--- Additional Comments From stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com 2005-06-07 07:54 --- Another testcase possibly, that triggers the fault on 20050605 with parameters -march=pentium4 -O3 -ftree-vectorize, but not with -O2 or -O1. Bug 21933 seems related but doesn't trigger with -

[Bug tree-optimization/21884] [4.1 regression] ICE with -ftree-vectorize

-- What|Removed |Added CC||stefaan dot deroeck at gmail ||dot com http://gcc.gnu.org