https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100383
--- Comment #5 from Hannes Domani ---
This could be closed since gcc-13.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52160
Hannes Domani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssbssa at yahoo dot de
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86152
Hannes Domani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssbssa at yahoo dot de
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402
--- Comment #11 from Hannes Domani ---
> Your testcase does not compile with the C compiler:
>
> Compiling it with the C++ compiler works for me:
Sorry about the c/c++ confusion.
> Created attachment 50754 [details]
> Tentative fix
>
> Plea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402
--- Comment #3 from Hannes Domani ---
Created attachment 50745
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50745&action=edit
output of -fdump-tree-optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402
--- Comment #2 from Hannes Domani ---
Created attachment 50744
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50744&action=edit
assembly (-S)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402
--- Comment #1 from Hannes Domani ---
Created attachment 50743
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50743&action=edit
preprocessed code (-E)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402
Bug ID: 100402
Summary: Crash in longjmp
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100383
Bug ID: 100383
Summary: cfi sections directive detection fails with binutils
2.36
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860
--- Comment #36 from Hannes Domani ---
Note: This is a binutils/ld bug:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268
And I've sent a patch there:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-February/115434.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89807
--- Comment #1 from Hannes Domani ---
(In reply to Nickolay Kolchin-Semyonov from comment #0)
> uint8_t a = (v >> 24) & 0xFF; // ERROR: produces warning
> uint8_t a2 = v >> 24; // ERROR: produces warning
I think the '& 0xFF' part is opti
11 matches
Mail list logo