[Bug debug/100383] cfi sections directive detection fails with binutils 2.36

2024-07-20 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100383 --- Comment #5 from Hannes Domani --- This could be closed since gcc-13.1.

[Bug debug/52160] gdb ignores line "bar: if(foo)goto bar;"

2024-01-08 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52160 Hannes Domani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at yahoo dot de --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug demangler/86152] Failure to demange clone names with digits

2024-01-04 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86152 Hannes Domani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at yahoo dot de --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug target/100402] [10.3 regression] crash with setjmp/longjmp and SEH

2021-05-05 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402 --- Comment #11 from Hannes Domani --- > Your testcase does not compile with the C compiler: > > Compiling it with the C++ compiler works for me: Sorry about the c/c++ confusion. > Created attachment 50754 [details] > Tentative fix > > Plea

[Bug target/100402] Crash in longjmp

2021-05-03 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402 --- Comment #3 from Hannes Domani --- Created attachment 50745 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50745&action=edit output of -fdump-tree-optimized

[Bug target/100402] Crash in longjmp

2021-05-03 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402 --- Comment #2 from Hannes Domani --- Created attachment 50744 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50744&action=edit assembly (-S)

[Bug target/100402] Crash in longjmp

2021-05-03 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402 --- Comment #1 from Hannes Domani --- Created attachment 50743 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50743&action=edit preprocessed code (-E)

[Bug target/100402] New: Crash in longjmp

2021-05-03 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402 Bug ID: 100402 Summary: Crash in longjmp Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: un

[Bug debug/100383] New: cfi sections directive detection fails with binutils 2.36

2021-05-02 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100383 Bug ID: 100383 Summary: cfi sections directive detection fails with binutils 2.36 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

2021-02-26 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #36 from Hannes Domani --- Note: This is a binutils/ld bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268 And I've sent a patch there: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-February/115434.html

[Bug c/89807] Incorrect -Wconversion warning when shifting uint32_t with 24

2021-02-13 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89807 --- Comment #1 from Hannes Domani --- (In reply to Nickolay Kolchin-Semyonov from comment #0) > uint8_t a = (v >> 24) & 0xFF; // ERROR: produces warning > uint8_t a2 = v >> 24; // ERROR: produces warning I think the '& 0xFF' part is opti