[Bug c++/30524] New: Template argument is not recognized as a Type inside a template function.

2007-01-21 Thread SSacek at appsecinc dot com
rmal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: SSacek at appsecinc dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30524

[Bug c++/29378] The copy constructor is not being called upon return from function calls.

2006-10-07 Thread SSacek at appsecinc dot com
--- Comment #2 from SSacek at appsecinc dot com 2006-10-07 09:19 --- Ok, I see that GCC has a work-around for this issue, but I must insist that the GCC compiler is incorrect in its interpretation of the C++ standard for two reasons. 1) Optimizations should be allowed for temporary

[Bug c++/29378] New: The copy constructor is not being called upon return from function calls.

2006-10-07 Thread SSacek at appsecinc dot com
unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: SSacek at appsecinc dot com GCC build triplet: gcc version 3.4.6 GCC host triplet: Red Hat 3.4.6-3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29378

Sorry - The copy constructor is not being called

2006-10-06 Thread ssacek
The program below works for the Solaris and Microsoft compilers, but not for the GCC compiler. Can anybody else verify this, and or if it's already been fixed? I'm using: -bash-3.00$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/specs Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr

Copy constructor is not being called

2006-10-06 Thread ssacek

[Bug c++/25773] New: Preprocessor concatenation of forward-slash fails

2006-01-12 Thread SSacek at appsecinc dot com
slash fails Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: SSacek at appsecinc dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bug

[Bug c++/21903] Default argument of template function causes a compile-time error

2005-06-04 Thread SSacek at appsecinc dot com
--- Additional Comments From SSacek at appsecinc dot com 2005-06-04 19:17 --- Dear Giovanni Bajo, Thank you for that detailed explanation. Based on what you said, it sounds like a complex problem to solve; however, it may not be as difficult as it first appears. Take the example

[Bug c++/21903] Default argument of template function causes a compile-time error

2005-06-04 Thread SSacek at appsecinc dot com
--- Additional Comments From SSacek at appsecinc dot com 2005-06-04 18:28 --- I would like to thank you folks at gcc.gnu.org for taking a serious look at this issue. I wanted to write here a little bit about what I do and how this matter came to light. It is my occupation to write

[Bug c++/21903] New: Default argument of template function causes a compile-time error

2005-06-03 Thread SSacek at appsecinc dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: SSacek at appsecinc dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21903