[Bug fortran/47692] Numeric inaccuracy reported in testing lapack-3.3.0 BLAS module

2012-03-19 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692 Cezary Sliwa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sliwa at blue dot

[Bug other/49137] build fails when gmp/mpfr already installed

2011-12-16 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49137 --- Comment #2 from Cezary Sliwa 2011-12-16 12:17:18 UTC --- tar jxf gcc-4.5.3.tar.bz2 tar jxf gmp-4.3.2.tar.bz2 tar jxf mpfr-3.0.0.tar.bz2 tar zxf mpc-0.9.tar.gz patch -p1 -d mpfr-3.0.0 ../libgmp.la -rw-r--r-- 1 sliwa users 752 Dec 16 1

[Bug other/49137] New: build fails when gmp/mpfr already installed

2011-05-24 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49137 Summary: build fails when gmp/mpfr already installed Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug libfortran/48950] a patch from 4.4.x not backported to 4.3.x

2011-05-10 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48950 --- Comment #6 from Cezary Sliwa 2011-05-10 19:11:22 UTC --- PS. The gfortran version of ACML 4.4.0 appears to be built with 4.3.x.

[Bug libfortran/48950] a patch from 4.4.x not backported to 4.3.x

2011-05-10 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48950 --- Comment #5 from Cezary Sliwa 2011-05-10 19:08:34 UTC --- OK, if everything is backported you get the current version... I agree this does not make sense. But this has a maintained status, which gives people a false sense of security. You buil

[Bug libfortran/48950] New: a patch from 4.4.x not backported to 4.3.x

2011-05-10 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48950 Summary: a patch from 4.4.x not backported to 4.3.x Product: gcc Version: 4.3.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: un

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

2011-04-21 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 --- Comment #1 from Cezary Sliwa 2011-04-21 22:33:36 UTC --- Sorry, I almost forgot: $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/gcc/4.6.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-redhat-linux

[Bug fortran/48720] New: quad precision literals do not work

2011-04-21 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 Summary: quad precision literals do not work Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...@g

[Bug fortran/48719] New: quad precision intrinsics are missing

2011-04-21 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48719 Summary: quad precision intrinsics are missing Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unass

[Bug fortran/48718] New: gfortran crash

2011-04-21 Thread sliwa at blue dot cft.edu.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718 Summary: gfortran crash Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org Re