https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122031
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122021
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122009
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122021
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122021
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
```
#include
#include
__attribute__ ((noipa)) static void
vp9_build_inter_predictor (int a)
{
int16_t row = a * 2;
int32_t row_w = (int)((int64_t)row * 16384 >> 14);
if (row_w != -544)
__builtin_ab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122021
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122021
Bug ID: 122021
Summary: [16 regression] libvpx miscompiled with -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122015
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122010
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
With GCC 13, I get:
$ gcc-13 a.c -o - -S -O2
.file "a.c"
.text
.p2align 4
.globl test
.type test, @function
test:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
ret
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122012
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122012
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Summary|Intern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119215
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
I keep missing regressions in other FEs (like ada, modula2) because I can't use
-Werror= as a result of this bug. Gentle ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122009
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122009
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122009
Bug ID: 122009
Summary: [16 regression] ODR issues in m2
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122008
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Sam James -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122002
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #9 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122006
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122006
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Edwin Lu from comment #1)
> Likely caused by r16-3996-gdc78d691c5e
I don't think so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122002
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121830
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
Please file it separately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58727
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121974
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Summary|Timeout with -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121962
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #13 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121978
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Mathias Stearn from comment #0)
> Created attachment 62401 [details]
> repro.cpp
>
> Lightly modified from the repro for
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101244 while trying out a
> w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121958
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
We should document that it needs Python too.
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1)
Is the patch somewhere for us to play with? I want to see if I can repro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111273
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
It'd tell us if it was worked around (perhaps accidentally) by a library change
or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111273
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Simon Marchi from comment #3)
> I can reproduce the original problem with gcc 14.3.0, but with 15.2.0, it
> works fine. Can you confirm?
Did you try w/ preprocessed source from 14 on 15?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121963
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121961
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[coroutines] use-after-free |[15/16 regression]
|when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121623
--- Comment #19 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Frank Scheiner from comment #17)
> So just got back into this. Unfortunately the preprocessed source won't
> compile successfully with the used cross-compiler:
> ```
> root@esprimo-e420:/usr/src# i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121962
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
# reasonable (?)
$ time g++-15 -c
./lib/AST/CMakeFiles/obj.clangAST.dir/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp.ii -m32 -O1
real0m7.312s
user0m7.041s
sys 0m0.229s
# hangs
$ g++ -c ./lib/AST/CMakeFiles/obj.clangAST
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121962
Bug ID: 121962
Summary: [16 regression] OOM when buiding clang-19.1.7
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121962
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121962
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62387
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62387&action=edit
RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp.ii.xz
# reasonable (?)
$ time g++-15 -c
./lib/AST/CMakeFiles/obj.clangAST.dir/RecordLayout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121962
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121821
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121953
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
r16-3873-gbc4f29a1912cfe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121953
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Summary|[16 regression] Fai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121953
Bug ID: 121953
Summary: [16 regression] Failed Ada bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121952
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121952
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121206
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121932
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
So far, nothing failed with the patch, but it's not done yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121932
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
I'll try it out and see if anything else fails. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121936
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121935
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121934
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
(Sorry, had to truncate title due to length in order to fit the regression
marker in.)
For convenience, the original was: "ICE on valid code at -O3
"-fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121934
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on valid code at -O3|[16 regression] ICE on
|"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121932
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
```
struct enum_flags {
template void to_string(int (&)[N]);
};
struct language_defn {
virtual void language_arch_info(int *, int *) const;
virtual void lookup_symbol_local(const enum_flags) {}
};
struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121932
Bug ID: 121932
Summary: [16 regression] ICE when building gdb trunk with LTO
(tree code ‘template_parm_index’ is not supported in
LTO stream)
Product: gcc
Versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121932
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121932
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Pretty sure it's from r16-3821-gb9fde0219f35cd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121931
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110442
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Works well for me so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110442
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-09-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110442
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Ah, your patch may handle that already with sanitize_flags_p.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110442
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
$ gcc a.c -o a -ggdb3 -fsanitize=thread
during RTL pass: expand
a.c: In function ‘resolve’:
a.c:16:1: internal compiler error: in expand_TSAN_FUNC_EXIT, at
internal-fn.cc:885
16 | resolve (void)
| ^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121920
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
It's appreciated, especially because for some reason, the other bug didn't show
up for ages *and* it only happened with LTO which made reducing it a pain too.
Thank you!
We should probably add the testcase eith
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121920
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110442
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
We should disable all instrumentation, at least if it needs a runtime.
With -fsanitize=undefined:
```
void *
resolve (void)
{
int a = 1 << 32;
__builtin_cpu_init ();
if (__builtin_cpu_supports ("f16c"))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121689
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(objdump + cvise, comparing with and without -fno-gcse will be good enough to
start.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121689
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Could you try get a smaller standalone testcase? The first thing you want is
just the function that is miscompiled (and shows the difference in assembly) in
a file by "itself" (minimal set of typedefs, variables
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120288
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 regression] spurious |[15/16 regression] spurious
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121889
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Summa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121889
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121885
Bug ID: 121885
Summary: [16 regression] New -Wlto-type-mismatch warning in Ada
(type of ‘snames__get_pragma_id’ does not match
original declaration)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121885
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121723
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> A lot of the time non-delegitimized with UNSPEC UNSPEC_GOTPCREL is hard to
> fix.
Does the same apply for UNSPEC_SET_GOT?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121882
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95059
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-09-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91692
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121877
Bug ID: 121877
Summary: Parallel build issues with libgo
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121877
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62354
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62354&action=edit
build.log.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
--- Comment #29 from Sam James ---
I was going to ask the same thing. In this case, it'd be appreciated even
though it's maybe a bigger change than we'd normally like, because it happens
with so many packages.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121874
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121865
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Thank you Nathaniel! I was going to start slowly reducing it today and glad I
don't have to now ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121865
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62349
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62349&action=edit
modules2.tar.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121865
Bug ID: 121865
Summary: ICE with modules and LTO (expected template_decl, have
overload in maybe_template_info, at cp/mangle.cc:311)
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121864
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Dunno why my workstation lost backtraces but whatever, an issue for another
time. Here it is from another machine:
```
in pp_string, at pretty-print.cc:2640
1 | # 0 "a.ii"
0x55c544b42e1a internal_error(char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121864
Bug ID: 121864
Summary: ICE with empty (or trivial) source, C++ modules, and
-save-temps
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121852
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.5
Summary|wrong code at -O2 w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121863
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121848
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> The test passes for me on aarch64.
It passes with --enable-default-pie or -fPIE, but fails without.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121848
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
The test passes for me on aarch64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121848
Bug ID: 121848
Summary: gfortran.dg/gomp/pr107421.f90 FAILs on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107421
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
I filed PR121848 for the test failure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107393
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107419
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107421
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121846
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(I did start implementing that for glibc a little while ago, it's easy, just
tedious, and dunno if we'd consider that backportable, while stripping nonnull
should be certainly backported.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121846
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121844
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.4|15.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121844
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16,15 Regression] RISCV|[15/16 Regression] RISCV
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121743
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.3
Summary|ICE in build_functi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121831
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Note fixing the ODR issue:
>
> Fixes the ICE.
As discussed on IRC, just noting for completeness, it repros w/ valid:
a.cxx:
```
struct array1 {
unsigned char _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121835
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Ah, that'd do it - only aarch64, i386, arm, riscv have the hook.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121835
Bug ID: 121835
Summary: [16 regression] Failed bootstrap in
powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu wiht new dep fusion pass
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121835
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121830
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 2924 matches
Mail list logo
