--- Comment #12 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2008-03-10 10:28
---
> You really need to put the breakpoint on 'error' to be sure. Source location
> information is seriously shaken by optimization in the 4.x series of compilers
> so I wouldn't rely
--- Comment #10 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2008-02-26 10:36
---
With CFLAGS="-g -O1 -fno-unit-at-a-time -fno-crossjumping -Wno-pointer-sign", I
cannot hit the breakpoint on error (ie, if I put a breakpoint on error itself).
Also, I cannot hit the breakpoint at
--- Comment #7 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2008-02-19 14:44
---
Sorry, for internals.c and internals.i, read intervals2.c and intervals2.i.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35249
--- Comment #6 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2008-02-19 14:40
---
Created an attachment (id=15184)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15184&action=view)
intervals2.c and output of -v -save-temps
Maybe it was easier than I thought. I took out the f
--- Comment #4 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2008-02-19 12:04
---
OK, before I start hacking, what is it that you need once I have found a
function?
What I can do is try to identify a function or minimal functions that, when
compiled in a file with optimisation, will cause
--- Comment #2 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2008-02-18 18:06
---
> > I appreciate that Emacs is not the smallest of test cases and I apologise in
> > advance for this crime. Anything I can do to help determine the cause?
>
> Are you familiar with src/i
ED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: simon dot marshall at misys dot com
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35249
--- Comment #3 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2007-09-11 12:51
---
This seems to apply to 4.2.2-RC-20070909 too.
--
simon dot marshall at misys dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2007-09-04 08:43
---
OK, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33293
--- Comment #4 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2007-09-04 08:01
---
Many thanks for the quick response. Any chance it could make it into 4.2.2?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33293
--- Comment #2 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2007-09-03 16:54
---
This is also true of 4.2.1. Sorry if I have missed something.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31955
y: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: simon dot marshall at misys dot com
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33293
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: simon dot marshall at misys dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31958
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: simon dot marshall at misys dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31955
--- Comment #4 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2005-11-08 17:41
---
Is there a target milestone for this? IWBI it were fixed on 3.4 as well as
4.0.
(Appologies if I seem impertinent, I'm not too familiar with the way things
work.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #8 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2005-11-08 12:51
---
FYI, I raised this error with glibc with a slightly different attachment.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1830 has the code Jakub refers
to.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
16 matches
Mail list logo
