https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
Luke Robison changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #23 from Luke Robison ---
(In reply to Luke Robison from comment #22)
> (In reply to Luke Robison from comment #21)
> > (1) Changing some or all of the "type(levelNN)" definitions to
> > "class(levelNN)" definitions
> > (2) Changing f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #22 from Luke Robison ---
(In reply to Luke Robison from comment #21)
> (1) Changing some or all of the "type(levelNN)" definitions to
> "class(levelNN)" definitions
> (2) Changing from "allocatable" to "pointer"
>
Although these wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
--- Comment #21 from Luke Robison ---
I was again trying to upgrade our gfortran version and ran into this issue
again in gfortran-9.2, but I think I found a workaround this time.
Re-reading Paul Thomas' comments and looking at the changes in th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #17 from Luke Robison ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #8)
> Luke, do you ever build gcc?
I applied these patches to 8.2.0 and got the expected error message and iostat
of 26. Looks good to me. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #4 from Luke Robison ---
> First, what virtualbox is doing is a violation of common UNIX
> semantics, so we would be within our rights :-) to do this.
Agreed. This is definitely outside of the norm for a unix
filesystem. I just tri
Component: libfortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
Target Milestone: ---
Version: GNU Fortran (Ubuntu 7.2.0-8ubuntu3.2) 7.2.0
OS: Guest Ubuntu running inside Host Windows 10 using VirtualBox
Problem:
CLOSE(status='DELE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827
Luke Robison changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robison at arlut dot utexas.edu
