--- Comment #7 from rcbilson at plg dot uwaterloo dot ca 2006-01-26 16:59
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> class xxx is NOT a POD.
Indeed not. Thank you for explaining, and sorry to waste your time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25927
--- Comment #2 from rcbilson at plg dot uwaterloo dot ca 2006-01-23 18:28
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hmm, is this a non POD?
Quoth the standard (9p4):
"A POD-struct is an aggregate class that has no nonstatic data members of type
pointer to member, non-POD-struct, non-P
r still, if *both* q and r are made public g++ accepts the code without
complaint.
--
Summary: Spurious offsetof warnings with private members
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rcbilson at plg dot uwaterloo dot ca
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc
--- Additional Comments From rcbilson at plg dot uwaterloo dot ca
2005-03-16 15:12 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The problem occurs only with GCC 4.x, in particular not with GCC 3.4.3.
This was strange to read, because I've definitely noticed it with 3.4.3.
Interestingly, it
--- Additional Comments From rcbilson at plg dot uwaterloo dot ca
2005-03-01 16:52 ---
Attempting to change "Reported against"...
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rcbilson at plg dot uwaterloo dot ca
2005-03-01 16:50 ---
I seem to have screwed something up in gccbug -- this is not a 2.95 issue. I've
encoundered this problem with 3.4.3 and with the Feb. 28 mainline CVS version.
--
What|Re
