--- Comment #2 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2007-03-19
02:52 ---
A similar problem also exists on the dataflow branch. Adding Kenneth Zadeck to
the CC.
However fno-tree-lrs has no impact in the df branch as on revision 122955 .
--
ramana dot radhakrishnan at
auses differring
behaviours.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codi
--- Comment #1 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-12-08
15:14 ---
The ICE comes from compute_init_costs in rtl-factoring.c where rtx_store is set
to be
/* Pattern for storing address. */
rtx_store = gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, reg, gen_symbol_ref_rtx_for_label
gned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30121
--- Comment #7 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-10-09
16:33 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
flow.c is responsible for generating POST_INCs and POST_MODIFY's in 3.4 / 4.0 /
4.1 / 4.2 . I believe this is being replaced by the new data flow bits in the
data flow b
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-linux
GCC target triplet: m68k-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28173
--- Comment #5 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-06-26
19:13 ---
This should be reopened. A related testcase shows a regression from 3.4.6 to
4.1.1 for m68k-elf shows a regression . combine used to take care of this in
3.4.6 . A backport of the patch is ready with
--- Comment #14 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-06-07
21:20 ---
Add self to CC.
--
ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-05-16
12:11 ---
Richi on IRC suggested that a weak attribute for reloc_num would fix this . The
assumption being made is that the address of reloc_num can never be 0 , which
ofcourse is not the case for a weak symbol
--- Comment #1 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-05-16
10:45 ---
Clicked too early. Can be marked invalid.
--
ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux
GCC target triplet: powerpc-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27625
: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux
GCC target triplet: powerpc-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27623
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.or
--- Comment #1 from ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com 2006-03-07
10:49 ---
Occurs with arm-none-eabi-gcc 4.1.0 -branch with yesterday's update.
--
ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com changed:
What|Removed |
: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: arm-none-eabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26591
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
2005-07-27 10:20 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> No that's wrong. WAITING means waiting feedback *from submitter*.
This has been approved at :
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg01918.html
Can
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
2005-07-27 10:19 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> No, that'd be wrong. The correct status for a bug with a pending patch is
> ASSIGNED.
Can the target milestone be changed ? I see this has been approv
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
2005-04-22 07:43 ---
If the above patch set is applied for 3.3.6, please also apply this patch so
that the build does not break.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/arc/lib1funcs.asm.diff?cvsroot
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
2004-11-17 04:09 ---
Now that gcc 3.4 branch is thawed , could this patch be applied to the 3.4
branch as well .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18263
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
2004-11-01 12:23 ---
Patch submitted at :
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg00024.html
--
What|Removed |Added
fix this PR shortly.
--
Summary: Build broken for ARC.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ramana dot rad
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
2004-10-12 12:33 ---
All these would be due to non-use of the define_predicate md file construct. The
backend needs to be cleaned to use the new define_predicate construct.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com
2004-10-11 05:16 ---
Patch submitted for review.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00891.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17317
23 matches
Mail list logo
