++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: public at alisdairm dot net
Target Milestone: ---
The following code fails to compile when the macro is defined:
#include
using namespace std::literals;
#if defined SHOW_BUG
auto x = 1'23s
#else
auto x = 123s;
#endif
I /
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: public at alisdairm dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36999
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36999&action=edit
demonstrates requires clause d
: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: public at alisdairm dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 35841
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35841&action=edit
C++ code that should compile in C++14 mode, but fails
The attach
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: public at alisdairm dot net
Created attachment 35293
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35293&action=edit
source for easy testing
The following simp
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: public at alisdairm dot net
This bug looks looks obscure, but breaks our 'static assert' facility for C++03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #14 from Alisdair Meredith ---
Among other things, it lets fools like me write code relying on a behavior, not
realizing that the code is not portable. As a user I swing between the
convenience of having that utility, vs. the inconven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #11 from Alisdair Meredith ---
Created attachment 32298
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32298&action=edit
Portable test of ADL on local type
Agreed, not-a-bug.
For completeness, I attach a final test case that doe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #8 from Alisdair Meredith ---
I agree with Mark's analysis. I was trying to force use of swap on a local
class, and found a pattern that worked for libc++ but missed that neither
template would be more specialized - my original attemp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60448
--- Comment #1 from Alisdair Meredith ---
Created attachment 32287
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32287&action=edit
Cleaner tagging scheme for the local class
Simplified the example to more directly expose the local class via
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: public at alisdairm dot net
Created attachment 32286
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32286&action=edit
Demonstrate swap_ranges does not find swap via ADL
The attached program does not correctly use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55564
Bug #: 55564
Summary: internal error using decltype of a template type
parameter for late-specified function result type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Versio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54875
Bug #: 54875
Summary: Forward declare enums cannot be used as a template
argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52030
--- Comment #2 from Alisdair Meredith 2012-01-28
23:06:53 UTC ---
IT could well be - I struggled to get a more minimal example when not using
'make_tuple', and it could well be doing something similar, especially if it
yields the same ICE. Does
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52030
Bug #: 52030
Summary: ICE with decltype(make_tuple) is a late return type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51593
--- Comment #2 from Alisdair Meredith 2011-12-16
23:18:27 UTC ---
Thanks, I thought I had tried that, but I guess not.
It seems reasonable to close this as user error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51593
Bug #: 51593
Summary: alias templates fail in dependent contexts requiring
::template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50853
--- Comment #8 from Alisdair Meredith 2011-10-24
14:27:18 UTC ---
I am happy with closed - the ICE is resolved an PR50855 reports the
unimplemented error message, with (hopefully) a simpler test case.
It might be worth re-testing once PR50855 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50855
--- Comment #3 from Alisdair Meredith 2011-10-24
14:13:31 UTC ---
And just to confirm - it sounds like the ICE in PR50853 is a bad compiler at my
end. I suggest keeping *this* PR open, as at least it reports the correct
error!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50853
--- Comment #5 from Alisdair Meredith 2011-10-24
14:10:38 UTC ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-mp-4.6
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin10/4.6.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10
Configured with: ../gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50855
--- Comment #2 from Alisdair Meredith 2011-10-24
14:06:55 UTC ---
It might be. I still see an ICE for PR50853, but if that is giving the same
error now, then it is probably the same root cause. I'm still waiting to hear
if I have an issue with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50853
--- Comment #3 from Alisdair Meredith 2011-10-24
14:02:22 UTC ---
The original report was compiled with gcc 4.6.1 supplied by MacPorts. Could
you confirm if the not-supported error message occurs in trunk, or a separately
compiled gcc 4.6.1?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50855
Bug #: 50855
Summary: Name mangling for late return types invoking
constructors not implemented
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50853
Bug #: 50853
Summary: Internal Compiler Error returning a template type
using brace initialization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Bug #: 50810
Summary: c++0x-compat does not warn about narrowing conversions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
--- Comment #3 from public at alisdairm dot net 2010-04-30 13:15 ---
Subject: Re: [C++0x] constexpr should allow declaration without a
definition
I am aware constexpr is not fully supported, and checked with Jason before
filing this issue.
We believe that constexpr should
rsion: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: public at alisdairm dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43947
Summary: Cannot parse dependant type for enum-base in C++0x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: public at al
tedBy: public at alisdairm dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40633
roduct: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: public at alisdairm dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40311
roduct: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: public at alisdairm dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40308
mal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: public at alisdairm dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40307
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: public at alisdairm dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40306
32 matches
Mail list logo
