[Bug c/61081] excessive warnings: right-hand operand of comma expression has no effect

2014-05-06 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61081 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 06:33:03PM +, peter_e at gmx dot net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61081 > > --- Comment #2 from Peter Eisentraut --- > No, these "functions" need to have a

[Bug tree-optimization/54676] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:433

2012-09-23 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54676 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/54669] [4.8 regression] verify_flow_info failure after loop unrolling with -fnon-call-exceptions

2012-09-22 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54669 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek 2012-09-22 20:03:59 UTC --- It happens in cunrolli pass. It might be propagate_constants_for_unrolling. It seems we eventually end up removing BB 9 and 11, which might be wrong.

[Bug middle-end/54669] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 5 last statement has incorrectly set lp with -fnon-call-exceptions

2012-09-22 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54669 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek 2012-09-22 14:22:46 UTC --- With very slightly modified testcase: int a[10]; void foo (void) { int x; int i; for (i = 0; i < 1;) { int b[3]; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) b[i] = a[i];

[Bug middle-end/54669] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 5 last statement has incorrectly set lp with -fnon-call-exceptions

2012-09-22 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54669 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/54345] jump threading leaks e->aux heap memory

2012-09-21 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54345 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2012-09-21 15:11:08 UTC --- Hmm. I hoped that something like this will show the leak, but no (it does a lot of threading with -O2--through conditionals, through loop headers and also through latches). Bu

[Bug tree-optimization/54345] jump threading leaks e->aux heap memory

2012-09-20 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54345 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com

[Bug c/54621] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when compiling gSOAP generated Server module.

2012-09-18 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54621 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c/54486] Spurious printf format warning mentions nonexistent type 'sizetype'

2012-09-04 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54486 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

2012-09-02 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/54449] [4.8 Regression] ICE: vector VEC(T,base) index domain error, in will_be_nonconstant_expr_predicate at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1853 with -O -fno-guess-branch-probability

2012-09-01 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54449 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug inline-asm/54450] Extended asm in global scope

2012-09-01 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek 2012-09-01 13:15:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > May I ask why? See e.g. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-02/msg00943.html

[Bug inline-asm/54450] Extended asm in global scope

2012-09-01 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2012-09-01 11:10:10 UTC --- Also, __attribute__((naked)) for x86 will never be implemented.

[Bug inline-asm/54450] Extended asm in global scope

2012-09-01 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c/54428] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7591

2012-08-30 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54428 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek 2012-08-31 05:46:07 UTC --- Reduced. Note that the typedef is needed to trigger ICE. typedef double _Complex fftw_complex; extern fftw_complex *fftw_alloc_complex (int); int cf (int n) { int K = 75; int n

[Bug c/54428] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7591

2012-08-30 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54428 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c/54409] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in remap_predicate, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2710

2012-08-29 Thread polacek at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54409 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||polacek at redhat dot com --- Comment #5