--- Comment #7 from poirierg at gmail dot com 2006-10-13 07:37 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Does it work when compiled with -O0 instead of -O4? How about -O1?
>
> Besies above, I noticed that the asm in get_cabac looks to be clobbering
> memory
> but is not marked
--- Comment #6 from poirierg at gmail dot com 2006-10-12 15:03 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Does it work when compiled with -O0 instead of -O4? How about -O1?
> >
> > Besies above, I noticed that the asm in get_cabac looks to be c
--- Comment #5 from poirierg at gmail dot com 2006-10-12 14:53 ---
Hello,
(In reply to comment #3)
> Does it work when compiled with -O0 instead of -O4? How about -O1?
The code compiles and produces the expected result with -O1, O2, but can't be
compiled with -O0:
In file
--- Comment #2 from poirierg at gmail dot com 2006-10-12 14:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=12419)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12419&action=view)
The header that seems to hold the code that's misscompiled
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29440
--- Comment #1 from poirierg at gmail dot com 2006-10-12 14:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=12418)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12418&action=view)
the offending file (results in a grey picture)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29440
Summary: 4.2 20061007 experiemental misscompiles
libavcodec/h264.o
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From poirierg at gmail dot com 2005-01-23 19:34
---
Sorry, the problem is not reproductable. A second round of compilation process,
and bam! The problem is gone. Go figure...
Anyway, if you ever find someting problematic is this code, please keep me
posted
--- Additional Comments From poirierg at gmail dot com 2005-01-23 19:26
---
Created an attachment (id=8046)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8046&action=view)
Here's the file that causes the ICE
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19592
t: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: poirierg at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19592
--- Additional Comments From poirierg at gmail dot com 2005-01-20 22:00
---
Hi,
I just tried with a fresh cvs checkout. It works! Thanks! (should I mark this
bug as VERIFIED ?)
Regards,
Guillaume
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19472
--- Additional Comments From poirierg at gmail dot com 2005-01-16 21:21
---
(From update of attachment 7968)
This slitly modified version of posprocess.c features a patch by James A.
Morrison that allowed the compilation of that code (it was previously not
possible) but triggers an ICE
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail||4.0.0
Known to work|
--- Additional Comments From poirierg at gmail dot com 2005-01-16 21:15
---
Created an attachment (id=7968)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7968&action=view)
a slitghly modified version of postprocess.c from the ffmpeg project
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
rror: in var_ann, at tree-flow-
inline.h:34
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: poirie
14 matches
Mail list logo
