[Bug c/99317] Missed warning

2021-03-01 Thread pj at hugeone dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99317 --- Comment #2 from Piotr --- @(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I dont think this is exactly a bug. The warning is a pedantic warning and > with void*, things are implicitly converted by standard c rules. With not `void *` it is exa

[Bug c/99317] New: Missed warning

2021-03-01 Thread pj at hugeone dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99317 Bug ID: 99317 Summary: Missed warning Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c/99011] Potentially missed optimization. Arrays are created without need

2021-02-08 Thread pj at hugeone dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99011 Piotr changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10.2.1 |10.2.0 --- Comment #1 from Piotr --- https://go

[Bug c/99011] New: Potentially missed optimization. Arrays are created without need

2021-02-08 Thread pj at hugeone dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99011 Bug ID: 99011 Summary: Potentially missed optimization. Arrays are created without need Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal