[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-13 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #40 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-13 09:18:16 UTC --- Seems that way 8/ I do apologise for consuming so much of everyone's time. My only defence being it wasn't terribly obvious without the com

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-12 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #38 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-12 14:10:52 UTC --- Ugh,... well, the good news is that I can now compile this successfully. I didn't even need to rebuild gcc. (although I will just to follow throu

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-11 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #36 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-11 17:20:35 UTC --- Created attachment 29149 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29149 g++/gcc testsuite results g++/gcc testsuite results

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-11 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #35 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-11 17:19:06 UTC --- (Sorry for the delay in getting back to you) I've multipass recompiled all the affected packages associated with gcc/glibc over the last day which has

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-09 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #33 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 17:27:18 UTC --- Ok,. thats 4.8.0 (gcc-trunk) rebuilt and tested.. fails bash-4.2# g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-09 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #31 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 16:00:56 UTC --- Hurm,... bash-4.2# cd /tmp bash-4.2# mkdir expand bash-4.2# cd expand/ bash-4.2# rpm2cpio /builddir/build/RPMS/libstdc++-4.7.2-8.fc18.sparc64.rpm

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-09 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #29 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 15:29:26 UTC --- Rebuilt fedoras 4.7.2-8 gcc without --enable-initfini-array reinstalled in a chroot and rebuilt the test program bash-4.2# g++ -v Using built-in specs

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-09 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #25 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 12:21:19 UTC --- Mmm yes I did notice the x86_64 trace I did bounced off into the tls/PLT area Breakpoint 1, __cxxabiv1::__cxa_get_globals () at ../../../../libstdc

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-09 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #22 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 10:59:13 UTC --- Ok so he's using 4.7.3 not 4.7.2-(butched by fedora folk) (there's about 24 patchs they apply) ugh,.. what would you like me to do here then?

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-09 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #19 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 10:37:38 UTC --- Mikael, could you compare against the versions of packages that I'm using? gcc requires the following according to fedora) cloog-ppl-0.15.11-4.f

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-09 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #15 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 09:06:38 UTC --- I've a fc17 x86_64 box in the backroom here that I'm going to generate a comparison trace with [root@ZenV tmp]# gdb a.out (gdb) break ../../../

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-09 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #14 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 08:27:19 UTC --- Smallest test case program #include int main() { std::cerr << "we are able to write to stderr\n"; } bash-4.2# g++ test.c bash-

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-08 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #13 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 06:28:26 UTC --- Created attachment 29118 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29118 g++.log (part 2)

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-08 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #12 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 06:27:32 UTC --- Created attachment 29117 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29117 g++.log.tar.bz2 (part1) === g++ Summary for u

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-08 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #10 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 06:09:54 UTC --- Created attachment 29116 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29116 the gcc 4.7.2-8 srpm mangles the environment a bit but these are

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-08 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #9 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 02:32:26 UTC --- Ooo. GCC C++ testsuite,... umm well a quick summary is this,.. it's horrible. === g++ Summary === # of expected p

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-08 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 philip.copeland at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-08 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 philip.copeland at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29110|0 |1 is

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

2013-01-08 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #2 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-08 17:59:14 UTC --- Created attachment 29110 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29110 compressed tarball of .ii files Adding .ii files as a compres

[Bug libstdc++/55909] New: libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstd++

2013-01-08 Thread philip.copeland at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 Bug #: 55909 Summary: libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstd++ Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Statu