[Bug fortran/90519] New: ICE (segfault) on derived type which has a recursive allocatable component of the same type, and a static component of another type which has a "final" attribute

final" attribute Product: gcc Version: 7.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: perini at wisc dot edu Target

[Bug fortran/90150] wrong output produced by float format fX.Y descriptor following translated scientific format XpeY.Z

scientific format XpeY.Z https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90150 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 07:27:31PM +, perini at wisc dot edu wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90150 > > --- Comment #2 from federico --- > Numbe

[Bug fortran/90150] wrong output produced by float format fX.Y descriptor following translated scientific format XpeY.Z

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90150 --- Comment #2 from federico --- Number b=10.0, so in format f8.3 it should always be output as “ 10.000” ? Federico Perini From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 8:46:19 PM To: Federico

[Bug fortran/90150] New: wrong output produced by float format fX.Y descriptor following translated scientific format XpeY.Z

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: perini at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 46201 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46201&action=edit

[Bug fortran/89282] Garbage arithmetics results in fortran with -O3 and overloaded operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89282 --- Comment #3 from federico --- Thanks Dominique. - Output from gcc 5.3.0 has the same issue: type(t) object , size=5 x(1) = 2.0E+00 x(2) = 2.0E+00 x(3) = 2.0E+00 x(4) = 2.0E+00 x(5) = 4.25474E+15 type(t) object , siz

[Bug fortran/89282] Garbage arithmetics results in fortran with -O3 and overloaded operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89282 --- Comment #2 from federico --- $ gfortran -v Built by Equation Solution . Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfortran COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=c:/users/federico/gcc-6.2.0/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/6.2.0/lto-wrappe

[Bug fortran/89282] New: Garbage arithmetics results in fortran with -O3 and overloaded operators

: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: perini at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 45654 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45654&action=edit Small test program repr

[Bug fortran/78492] New: [OOP] Compiler segfault with non_overridable function in generic interface

: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: perini at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40128 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40128&action=edit Minimal program

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #11 from federico --- Janus, sure - please take your time! Opening a new ticket for this further issue. Thanks, Federico

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #9 from federico --- Janus, thanks for your hard work! I'm sorry to post another bug / possibly further evidence of the same bug. When the non_overridable function is part of a generic set, and the generic binding is called (eith

[Bug fortran/78443] [OOP] Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78443 --- Comment #8 from federico --- Created attachment 40127 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40127&action=edit Minimal program to test non_overridable functions in generic type-bound set

[Bug fortran/78443] New: Incorrect behavior with non_overridable keyword

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: perini at wisc dot edu Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40094 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40094&action=edit Minimal program to test the non_overridable keyword issue Hi, I&