http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57804
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@ and fortran@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01058.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00072.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57802
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@ and fortran@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01057.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00071.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57801
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@ and fortran@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01055.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00069.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57791
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@ and fortran@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01056.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00070.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57800
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patch@ and fortran@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01054.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00068.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57780
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00970.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57782
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00963.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57787
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00941.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57812
--- Comment #3 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00931.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811
--- Comment #4 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00930.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57790
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00880.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809
--- Comment #7 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patch@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00800.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57806
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patch@:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00799.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57803
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@ and fortran@:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00798.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00047.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57810
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00662.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57805
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00661.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809
--- Comment #5 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30449
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30449&action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 5252
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809
--- Comment #4 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30448
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30448&action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 4907
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809
--- Comment #3 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30447
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30447&action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 4856
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30446
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30446&action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 2594
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811
--- Comment #3 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30445
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30445&action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 4641
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30444
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30444&action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 3324
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57812
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30443
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30443&action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30442
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30442&action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 3324
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57812
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30441
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30441&action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57810
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30440
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30440&action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57806
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30439
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30439&action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57805
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30438
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30438&action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57804
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30437
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30437&action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57803
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30436
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30436&action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57802
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30435
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30435&action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57801
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30434
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30434&action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57800
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
Created attachment 30433
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30433&action=edit
Suggested patch
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "computed_jump_p()" in gcc/rtlanal.c, the loop on line 2801 should
break i
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "find_reloads()" in gcc/reload.c, the loop on line 3324 should break
immediately af
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "validate_const_int()" in gcc/read-rtl.c, the loop on line 804 sh
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "omega_eliminate_red()" in gcc/omega.c, the loop on line 2592 should
break i
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "propagate_nothrow()" in gcc/ipa-pure-const.c, the loop on line 1432
sh
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "write_roots()" in gcc/gengtype.c, the loop on line 4682 should break
immediately aft
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "gfc_trans_transfer()" in gcc/fortran/trans-io.c, the loop on line
2261 sh
-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "gfc_build_dummy_array_decl()" in gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c, the loop
o
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "set_loop_bounds()" in gcc/fortran/trans-array.c, the loop on line
4456 should break i
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "resolve_variable()" in gcc/fortran/resolve.c, the loop on line 4908
should break i
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method "gfc_match_call()" in gcc/fortran/match.c, the loop on line 4189
should break immediatel
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30430
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30430&action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 20
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30429
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30429&action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 20
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30428
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30428&action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 200588 in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57788
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang ---
(In reply to Po-Chun Chang from comment #0)
> Created attachment 30427 [details]
> Suggested patch
>
> The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9. I have attached a
> one-line patch that fixes it.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30427
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30427&action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30426
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30426&acti
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30424
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30424&action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 20
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30423
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30423&action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 200588 in
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30421
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30421&action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in the revision 200588 in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57276
Po-Chun Chang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
Created attachment 30111
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30111&action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in version 4.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57151
Bug #: 57151
Summary: Wasted work in method verify_cgraph_node
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
56 matches
Mail list logo