http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #12 from Paul Scruby 2012-09-06
13:03:17 UTC ---
I just tried Matt Hargett's patch from Bug53572 with gcc4.7.1 and it still has
not fixed the problem we're having. I'll continue test these issues in our
codebase with new versions of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #11 from Paul Scruby 2012-06-14
11:46:32 UTC ---
I've written half a dozen test harnesses this morning to tried to recreate this
bug unsuccessfully. My team writes very low-latency code so they do quite a
lot of 'abusive' (but legal)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #10 from Paul Scruby 2012-06-14
08:16:28 UTC ---
I released that I needed to add Yuri's patch to gcc-4.7.1.RC-20120606 as it had
not made it into the trunk. However, this still made no difference and I still
had the same linking prob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #9 from Paul Scruby 2012-06-13
16:44:12 UTC ---
Unfortunately I still have this linking issue with gcc-4.7.1-RC-20120606 and
binutils-2.22 so I don't think it's a dup for PR 53572.
I'll try to make a standalone project tomorrow which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #8 from Paul Scruby 2012-06-13
14:34:38 UTC ---
Cheers Jon, I'll try this afternoon...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
Paul Scruby changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #2 from Paul Scruby 2012-06-07
17:14:13 UTC ---
The 4.7.0 code is different so the patch didn't work:
'struct varpool_node' has no member named 'symbol'
I'm not familiar with the gcc internals so I'm not sure what I need to add to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
Bug #: 53604
Summary: ld reports errors using lto after upgrading from
gcc-4.6.2 to gcc-4.7.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFI
