https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113194
--- Comment #4 from Paul Hua ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Works for me with r14-6875-g3a7dd24eadeb91 on x86_64:
> ./cc1plus tmp/ExtractAPIConsumer.cpp.ii -quiet -Og -fPIC
> -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113194
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hua ---
Created attachment 56972
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56972&action=edit
preprocessed file
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
build cmd on LoongArch:
cc1plus -fpreprocessed
tools/clang/lib/ExtractAPI/CMakeFiles/obj.clangExtractAPI.dir/ExtractAPIConsumer.cpp.ii
-quiet -dumpdir tools/clang/lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106459
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94920
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98616
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93893
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77510
--- Comment #5 from Paul Hua ---
Created attachment 48830
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48830&action=edit
testing patch
this patch reduce reservation of model do not more than 10 cycles. The memory
of genautomata down to 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77510
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95830
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #40
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95830
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10 regression][MIPS/MSA] |[11 regression][MIPS/MSA]
|
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Since gcc-11-1445-g502d63b6d61 O3-pr45971 fails on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94842
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94780
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
#include
#include
class A {
public:
A() {};
int m;
};
int main() {
A* src = new A;
src->m = 10;
A* src_p = new(src) A;
printf("%d\n",
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The follow test fails between r272831 and r272852.
FAIL: gcc.target/mips/madd-3.c -O1 scan-assembler-times
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90357
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90357
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hua ---
Fix patch:
diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c b/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
index 1de33b2..89fc073 100644
--- a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
+++ b/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
@@ -4849,6 +4849,7 @@ mips_split_move (rtx dest, rtx
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46300
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89623
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89378
--- Comment #4 from Paul Hua ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Created attachment 45960 [details]
> gcc9-pr89378.patch
>
> Untested (quite obvious) fix, though I don't really have a way to test this.
> If you could test this, I c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89378
--- Comment #2 from Paul Hua ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> MSA is new, so not sure if it is a regression. Please fill out
> known-to-work.
r267643 not iced, but fails to optimize the code.
f1:
.frame $sp,16,$31
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 45741
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45741&acti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87761
--- Comment #5 from Paul Hua ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Can you please recheck with current trunk, many RA improvements related to
> r265398 change went into trunk since then.
all those test still fails on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88349
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hua ---
paulhua@gcc122:~/test/debug_msa$ cat v16i8_cmpi.i
typedef signed char v16i8 __attribute__ ((vector_size(16)));
v16i8 test31_s_v16i8 (v16i8 i) {
return i < 5;
}
good asm:
test31_s_v16i8:
.frame $
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
paulhua@gcc122:~/test/debug_mult-16$ cat mult-16.i
typedef int DI __attribute__((mode(DI)));
typedef int SI
: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
./build/gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed pr84941.i -mel -quiet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87761
--- Comment #2 from Paul Hua ---
and and new fails:
716 FAIL: gcc.target/mips/octeon-exts-3.c -O2 scan-assembler-times
\\texts\\t 3
717 FAIL: gcc.target/mips/octeon-exts-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87761
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hua ---
and other new fails:
681 FAIL: gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-5.c -O1 scan-assembler
\\tsdc1\\t\$f12,0(\$6)\\n
682 FAIL: gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-5.c -
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
paulhua@gcc122:~/debug_r265398$ cat fix-r4000-10.i
# 1
"/home/xuchenghu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87720
--- Comment #2 from Paul Hua ---
untested patch:
Index: gcc/combine.c
===
--- gcc/combine.c (revision 265456)
+++ gcc/combine.c (working copy)
@@ -14965,7 +14965,11 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87720
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hua ---
This c
: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 44885
--> https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87156
--- Comment #4 from Paul Hua ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> Does the attached patch fix the bootstrap?
> Index: cgraphclones.c
> ===
> --- cgraphclones.c (revis
,
||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hua ---
confirmed.
cced: Jan Hubicka
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 44318
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44318&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86067
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86067
--- Comment #2 from Paul Hua ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Which GCC version did you use?
the trunk version (r261200)
It's also ICEed on gcc-7 and gcc-8.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 44239
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44239&action=edit
preprocessed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84623
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
paulhua@erpro8-fsf2:~/GCC/build/gcc-r257826_obj$ ./gcc/xgcc -B./gcc
/home/p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84241
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #11 from Paul Hua ---
>
> Actually, I think that assembly looks unaffected by the issue.
>
Right.
> I have some doubts about the commits mentioned in this thread as well.
> r240965 looks like it simply changes the code generator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #8 from Paul Hua ---
On GCC 8.x, the r248351 fixed this.
commit fd891ec7f659e8785c3ed5757f6e60c95117b837
Author: segher
Date: Mon May 22 21:20:51 2017 +
cfgcleanup: Ignore clobbers in bb_is_just_return
The function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81874
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81041
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80948
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80306
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80509
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
--- Comment #5 from Paul Hua ---
(In reply to Paul Hua from comment #4)
>
> Maybe the r242326 cause the bug, the r242324 build success.
>
The r242326 and r242324 has another bug that r242522 fixed. If use r242326 to
reproduce this bug, you shou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
--- Comment #4 from Paul Hua ---
The r243817 still build failure.
configure:3460: /home/xuchenghua/GCC/test/gcc-r243817_obj/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/xuchenghua/GCC/test/gcc-r2438
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78660
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hua ---
The latest version r243504 still build fail.
The version r241773 can build successfully.
IRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
checking for mips64el-unknown-linux-gcc...
/home/xuchenghua/GCC/test/gcc-r243216_obj/./gcc/xgcc
-B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65682
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69129
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69134
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012
--- Comment #10 from Paul Hua ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #9)
> (In reply to Paul Hua from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #6)
> > > (In reply to Paul Hua from comment #5)
> > > > Created attachment 37115
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012
--- Comment #8 from Paul Hua ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #6)
> (In reply to Paul Hua from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 37115 [details]
> > building command
>
> I'm unable to reproduce.
> What is your cross-compiler comman
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012
--- Comment #5 from Paul Hua ---
Created attachment 37115
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37115&action=edit
building command
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012
--- Comment #4 from Paul Hua ---
Created attachment 37114
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37114&action=edit
preprocessed source for maxval_r4.c
The compile command line :
cc1 -fpreprocessed maxval_r4.i -mel -quiet -dumpbase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012
--- Comment #1 from Paul Hua ---
The cross compile also crashed ...
/home/xuchenghua/GCC/mips/gcc-trunk-231896-o32_obj/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/xuchenghua/GCC/mips/gcc-trunk-231896-o32_obj/./gcc/
-B/home/xuchenghua/toolchain/cross-tool
s/gcc-o32/usr/m
: critical
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I compiled the gcc version trunk@231140 under platform mips64el. The flowning
error occurred.
../../../../gcc-653b0b0
70 matches
Mail list logo
