https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104
--- Comment #13 from Patrick McGehearty
---
I may be mistaken about the source of the issue being glibc.
Perhaps it is a system include file issue? Here are some
more details.
Here are some of the error messages I got when building with
__LIBG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104
--- Comment #8 from Patrick McGehearty
---
Thanks for the run.
On the plus side, I would expect FAIL or PASS to be consistent
for all optimization levels, so that's actually good that
they all match now.
I'm either I'm mistaken about the root
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104
--- Comment #5 from Patrick McGehearty
---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> So what is the status here? Are we just waiting for another patch to be
> submitted or it has been submitted and we're waiting on a review?
I submitted a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59714
--- Comment #11 from Patrick McGehearty
---
Thanks!
On 9/9/2021 5:54 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59714
>
> --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
> (In reply to Patrick McGehearty from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59714
Patrick McGehearty changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.mcgehearty at oracle
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104
--- Comment #3 from Patrick McGehearty
---
I meant to say "IF mode" instead of KF mode.
Shall I resubmit with that correction?
- patrick
On 7/20/2021 5:46 PM, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104
Patrick McGehearty changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.mcgehearty at oracle
dot c
