https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96608
Pekka S changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kaps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93132
--- Comment #2 from Pekka S ---
As the patch is pretty trivial, I think it's easiest if you simply make the
appropriate changes, including incrementing the atoi() values. I did mention
in the last paragraph that not incrementing the 1-based inde
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47580
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47580&action=edit
Use formatted attribu
: GC
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Host: i686-w64-mingw32 x86_64-w64-mingw32
Target: aarch64-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91833
--- Comment #3 from Pekka S ---
Well, actually I'm also using newlib (always using the latest trunk). It's
configured and built as usual (not patching anything), but I don't think I've
ever seen inhibit_libc being defined -- I did notice it in t
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
Target: aarch64-none-elf
Build: x86_64-linux-gnu
Hi.
libgcc/config/aarch64/lse.S
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
Target: aarch64-none-elf
Build: x86_64-linux
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46804
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46804&action=edit
constinit test cases
Hi.
Reading P1143R2 my understanding
Priority: P3
Component: driver
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Hi.
driver::detect_jobserver() et. al. now use fcntl() and `F_GETFD' to determine
status of a jobserver.
However,
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Hi.
A recent libgcov commit [1] that changed __gcov_merge_single function
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Hi.
AArch64 SVE2 flag patch (commit 33af5a3270d6c9abaf5c05040a89e41130cbd5ca) does
not update `gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h' (still uses unsigned long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90400
Pekka S changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kaps
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Build: 9.0.1 20190404
Hi.
This has appeared within the last four weeks or so. It seems that not all
operators
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Target: aarch64-none-elf
Build: x86_64-linux-gnu
Hi
: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42572
--> ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80755
--- Comment #1 from Pekka S ---
Created attachment 41359
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41359&action=edit
trips __has_include_next. must be placed under last-include-dir/
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41358
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41358&action=edit
pul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80753
--- Comment #1 from Pekka S ---
Created attachment 41357
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41357&action=edit
__has_include_next testcase on a non-existent file
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41356&action=edit
__has_include t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79209
--- Comment #5 from Pekka S ---
It's true what you quoted, but on the other hand the current behaviour does not
produce code that will not fault -- it will indeed fault.
I see the rationale behind the packed attribute applied to a structure (say
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: p...@gcc-bugzilla.mail.kapsi.fi
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 40571
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40571&action=edit
Packed volatile bitfield testcase for
21 matches
Mail list logo
