--- Comment #4 from o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2006-02-25
21:21 ---
> Y y((X()));
>
> How does GCC know that the temporary that holds X() is going to be stored in
> y?
By the definition of Y, obviously. There seems to be a very special way of
how GCC is
--- Comment #2 from o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2006-02-25
20:15 ---
Sure, those additional brackets I missed because I created this case
from scratch (and then forgot about it).
But the other points I don't see:
I seems trivial for gcc to find this sort of error:
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26471
gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26470
gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26469
gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26468
nedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26263
--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
2005-05-20 21:30 ---
Oh, yes, I did overlook that I had to pass also that object union_f
as parameter --- thanks for telling me! Now the code compiles again.
So it's an "internal compiler error on inco
mary: Internal compiler error on correct code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea
us: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19279
--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2004-10-13
17:52 ---
sorry, didn't want to do anything here, but just updating the page
seems to have created something ?!?!
--
What|Removed |
d fails.
Same behaviour with Suse 9.0, 9.1, on 32-bit pc, laptop and 64-bit
workstation.
I would be very glad for some help: I don't know how many days I've
spent with that issue in vain, and on the help mailing list I didn't
get any response.
--
Summary: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are
not compiled
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17975
--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2004-10-11
20:37 ---
Subject: Re: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled SOLVED
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 08:14:00PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Addi
--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2004-10-11
20:02 ---
Subject: Re: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:36:22PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Co
d fails.
Same behaviour with Suse 9.0, 9.1, on 32-bit pc, laptop and 64-bit
workstation.
I would be very glad for some help: I don't know how many days I've
spent with that issue in vain, and on the help mailing list I didn't
get any response.
--
Summary: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are
not compiled
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940
15 matches
Mail list logo
