[Bug debug/51873] New: stringstream is opaque with g++

2012-01-16 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51873 Bug #: 51873 Summary: stringstream is opaque with g++ Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug debug/51517] New: [4.4 regression ] Wrong debug information for pointers with negative strides.

2011-12-12 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51517 Bug #: 51517 Summary: [4.4 regression ] Wrong debug information for pointers with negative strides. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: U

[Bug fortran/45186] Gfortran 4.5.0 emits wrong linenumbers

2010-08-04 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
--- Comment #1 from nikolay at totalviewtech dot com 2010-08-04 21:03 --- Created an attachment (id=21397) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21397&action=view) example -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45186

[Bug fortran/45186] New: Gfortran 4.5.0 emits wrong linenumbers

2010-08-04 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
emits wrong linenumbers Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: nikolay at totalviewtech dot com http

[Bug debug/45181] No debug information for parameter type

2010-08-04 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
--- Comment #4 from nikolay at totalviewtech dot com 2010-08-04 14:23 --- Yes, this looks similar. The same error is seen in dwarf -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45181

[Bug debug/45181] No debug information for parameter type

2010-08-04 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
--- Comment #1 from nikolay at totalviewtech dot com 2010-08-04 13:29 --- Created an attachment (id=21395) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21395&action=view) Reproducer How to Repeat: Untar reproducer and run debugger to line 53. check all parameters, they

[Bug debug/45181] New: No debug information for parameter type

2010-08-04 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
RMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: nikolay at totalviewtech dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45181

[Bug fortran/33179] gfortran doesn't emit type information for allocatable arrays

2007-10-04 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
--- Comment #2 from nikolay at totalviewtech dot com 2007-10-04 17:13 --- Ok, Here is how it is implemented now: <1><1b1>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_structure_type) DW_AT_name: array_descriptor2 DW_AT_byte_size : 36 DW_AT_dec

[Bug fortran/33179] New: gfortran doesn't emit type information for allocatable arrays

2007-08-24 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
nedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: nikolay at totalviewtech dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33179

[Bug debug/33044] Local static variable in C++ constructor not visible for debugging

2007-08-24 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
--- Comment #8 from nikolay at totalviewtech dot com 2007-08-24 16:45 --- (In reply to comment #7) > This all comes down to cloning. > What do you mean? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33044

[Bug debug/33044] Local variables in C++ constructor not visible for debugging

2007-08-24 Thread nikolay at totalviewtech dot com
--- Comment #5 from nikolay at totalviewtech dot com 2007-08-24 13:15 --- This is not fixed neither in 4.1.0 nor in any later version. The problem is that DIE for static foofoo was indeed produced, but produced in wrong place. <2><260>: Abbrev Number: 7 (DW_TA