[Bug demangler/105039] rust demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105039 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug demangler/105039] rust demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105039 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug demangler/98886] stack overflow in cxxfilt, demangle_type, rust-demangle.c:854

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98886 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug demangler/99935] Stack exhaustion demangling rust mangled name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug demangler/98886] stack overflow in cxxfilt, demangle_type, rust-demangle.c:854

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98886 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug demangler/99935] Stack exhaustion demangling rust mangled name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- A revised patch to fix this PR has been prroposed on gcc-patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/589277.html

[Bug demangler/99188] cxxfilt may exist a uaf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99188 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug demangler/99935] Stack exhaustion demangling rust mangled name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > This patch breaks MinGW, see PR 101779 But it can be fixed by: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28207

[Bug demangler/101779] Compilation of rust-demangle.c fails on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug demangler/100968] libiberty: stuck in infinite loop in nm-new while demangling rust symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100968 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug demangler/99935] Stack exhaustion demangling rust mangled name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 50777 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50777&action=edit Proposed patch Here is a possible patch for the problem, adding a recursion limit to the demangle_path() functio

[Bug demangler/100177] New: Rust demangler tests fail on big-endian hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100177 Bug ID: 100177 Summary: Rust demangler tests fail on big-endian hosts Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: de

[Bug demangler/99935] New: Stack exhaustion demangling rust mangled name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935 Bug ID: 99935 Summary: Stack exhaustion demangling rust mangled name Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: dema

[Bug demangler/88629] Regression lead to Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function d_expression_1 in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13