[Bug c++/61455] Internal compiler error, and other confused errors, when using array notation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61455 Nick Tomlinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/62008] New: CilkPlus Array Notation ICE in build_array_notation_ref when trying to build a multidimensional array from a pointer.

Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nick.tomlinson at arm dot com Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Target: x86_64-unknown

[Bug other/61963] CilkPlus Array Notation ICE in build_array_notation_ref on malformed function arguments.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61963 Nick Tomlinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/61963] New: CilkPlus Array Notation ICE in build_array_notation_ref on malformed function arguments.

: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nick.tomlinson at arm dot com Created attachment 33212 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33212&action=edit A

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #13 from Nick Tomlinson --- (In reply to Nick Tomlinson from comment #12) > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30285 still produces an ICE > for me: > > I have tried this with: >- My system GCC (g++, version 4.9.1)

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 Nick Tomlinson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nick.tomlinson at arm dot com

[Bug other/59053] cilkplus branch compiler loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59053 Nick Tomlinson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nick.tomlinson at arm dot com

[Bug other/61962] New: GCC seems to enter an infinite loop when compiling the above code.

Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nick.tomlinson at arm dot com Created attachment 33211 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33211&action=edit A minimal reproducer Steps to re

[Bug middle-end/61455] New: Internal compiler error, and other confused errors, when using array notation

: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nick.tomlinson at arm dot com Created attachment 32911 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32911&action=edit A minimal reproducer When bui

[Bug other/59384] Cilk Plus array notation with for loop after segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59384 --- Comment #5 from Nick Tomlinson --- Hello I tried the new patch against the suggested revision (patch and revision from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01170.html). While I was able to patch and build GCC, I get an incorrect warni

[Bug other/59384] Cilk Plus array notation with for loop after segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59384 --- Comment #4 from Nick Tomlinson --- Created attachment 31944 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31944&action=edit Example that is broken when the suggested patch is used.

[Bug other/59384] Cilk Plus array notation with for loop after segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59384 --- Comment #2 from Nick Tomlinson --- I tried that patch against the latest CilkPlus branch, but could not apply it. I also tried building GCC 4.9 from trunk, but could not use cilk_for. Please could you let me know if there is a branch that supp

[Bug other/59384] New: Cilk Plus array notation with for loop after segfaults

Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nick.tomlinson at arm dot com CC: bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org Created attachment 31380 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31380&action=edit Minimal reproducer When I comp