[Bug c/61625] _Atomic should create a new type

2014-06-26 Thread nfxjfg at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61625 nfxjfg at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug c/61625] New: _Atomic should create a new type

2014-06-26 Thread nfxjfg at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nfxjfg at gmail dot com It seems currently, the C11 _Atomic attribute is treated as something like a storage class (or whatever else as what the compiler treats this internally), instead of constructing a new type that is separate from

[Bug c/55999] gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code

2013-01-15 Thread nfxjfg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999 --- Comment #3 from nfxjfg at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 00:35:52 UTC --- Can't attach log.txt (bugzilla is a POS and says "You already used the form to file attachment 29175."), so here it's inline: Using built-in sp

[Bug c/55999] gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code

2013-01-15 Thread nfxjfg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999 --- Comment #2 from nfxjfg at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 00:33:23 UTC --- Created attachment 29175 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29175 source of test program

[Bug c/55999] gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code

2013-01-15 Thread nfxjfg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999 --- Comment #1 from nfxjfg at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 00:28:15 UTC --- Created attachment 29174 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29174 source for miscompiled code

[Bug c/55999] New: gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code

2013-01-15 Thread nfxjfg at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999 Bug #: 55999 Summary: gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONF