https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61625
nfxjfg at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nfxjfg at gmail dot com
It seems currently, the C11 _Atomic attribute is treated as something like a
storage class (or whatever else as what the compiler treats this internally),
instead of constructing a new type that is separate from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999
--- Comment #3 from nfxjfg at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 00:35:52 UTC ---
Can't attach log.txt (bugzilla is a POS and says "You already used the form to
file attachment 29175."), so here it's inline:
Using built-in sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999
--- Comment #2 from nfxjfg at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 00:33:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 29175
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29175
source of test program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999
--- Comment #1 from nfxjfg at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 00:28:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 29174
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29174
source for miscompiled code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999
Bug #: 55999
Summary: gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates
incorrect code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONF