[Bug c++/51675] [C++11][4.7 Regression] Cannot create constexpr unions

2012-02-02 Thread nephatrine at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675 Daniel Wolf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nephatrine at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/51910] [4.7 Regression] -frepo linking failure

2012-01-22 Thread nephatrine at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Wolf 2012-01-22 22:10:17 UTC --- If someone has any ideas about what the issue might be or can point me in the right direction, I'll try to suss this out myself and post a patch if possible. I'm just not very familiar w

[Bug c++/51910] [4.7 Regression] -frepo linking failure

2012-01-19 Thread nephatrine at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Wolf 2012-01-20 04:46:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > That is the point of COMDAT so that duplicated function instantiations are not > done. They definitely are or the executable wouldn't be larger without -fre

[Bug c++/51910] [4.7 Regression] -frepo linking failure

2012-01-19 Thread nephatrine at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Wolf 2012-01-20 03:44:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is there a reason why you are using -frepo ? It is not as useful as it was > before elf had comdat. Removing -frepo seems to bloat my executable. The GCC doc

[Bug c++/51910] New: -frepo linking failure

2012-01-19 Thread nephatrine at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910 Bug #: 51910 Summary: -frepo linking failure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo