--- Comment #13 from nekkar at libero dot it 2005-11-28 18:14 ---
Hi Richard
Could you explain us in details what would be in your opinion the best solution
to this problem?
Should we create a new maverick crunch target with specific division code or
what else?
--
http
--- Comment #1 from nekkar at libero dot it 2005-11-26 16:35 ---
I forgot to specify those variables:
TARGET=arm-ep9312-linux-uclibc
PREFIX=/mnt/dati/cross-gcc-4x
--
nekkar at libero dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
olved symbols in libgcc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nekkar at libero dot it
GCC build triplet: x86_
--- Comment #1 from nekkar at libero dot it 2005-11-17 17:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=10264)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10264&action=view)
Preprocessed source
Just to be clear, the gcc-4_0-branch was updated today, after the last fix to
b
fpu=maverick
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nekkar at libero dot it
GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: armv4l-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24914
--- Comment #2 from nekkar at libero dot it 2005-11-14 20:43 ---
There is the very same problem with gcc 4.0.0
--
nekkar at libero dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from nekkar at libero dot it 2005-11-14 20:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=10241)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10241&action=view)
preprocessed source, as required
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24861
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nekkar at libero dot it
GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
GC
