[Bug c/47901] -Wall should not imply -Wformat-zero-length by default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47901 Samuel Bronson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||naesten at gmail dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug debug/59515] -Og doesn't generate out-of-line copies of inline functions like -O0 does

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59515 --- Comment #1 from Samuel Bronson --- Oh, I meant to delete this part: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.18-gdb.py", > line > 63, in

[Bug debug/59515] New: -Og doesn't generate out-of-line copies of inline functions like -O0 does

erity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: naesten at gmail dot com For example: naesten@hydrogen:~/hacking/bugs/gcc$ cat Og-inline-methods.cc struct Foo { int bar() { return 42; } }; Foo foo; int

[Bug preprocessor/53920] "gcc -E" does not honor #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-macro"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53920 --- Comment #1 from Samuel Bronson 2012-07-10 19:07:26 UTC --- Oh, I suppose I should mention that I ran into this because I was using ccache to compile Emacs with --enable-gcc-warnings, and by default ccache runs the preprocessor and the compile

[Bug preprocessor/50387] Doesn't process "_Pragma" when expanding a token sequence for #include

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50387 Samuel Bronson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||naesten at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug preprocessor/53920] New: "gcc -E" does not honor #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-macro"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53920 Bug #: 53920 Summary: "gcc -E" does not honor #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-macro" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug objc/53905] New: -Wformat-nonliteral gives false positives with __attribute__((format(NSString,...)))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53905 Bug #: 53905 Summary: -Wformat-nonliteral gives false positives with __attribute__((format(NSString,...))) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug other/52207] License on gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi screws up the licenses of many other documents.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52207 --- Comment #3 from Samuel Bronson 2012-02-13 18:54:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > This is clearly a matter for the SC. I'd suggest they seek approval from the > FSF to > > (a) put suitable terms directly on gcc-common.texi (maybe GFDL w

[Bug other/52207] New: License on gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi screws up the licenses of many other documents.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52207 Bug #: 52207 Summary: License on gcc/doc/include/gcc-common.texi screws up the licenses of many other documents. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug other/52204] New: libiberty/at-file.texi has no copyright or license statement whatsoever

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52204 Bug #: 52204 Summary: libiberty/at-file.texi has no copyright or license statement whatsoever Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCON

[Bug gcov-profile/40498] There is neither a negative form of -pg nor an __attribute__ to disable instrumentation of a specific function

--- Comment #2 from naesten at gmail dot com 2009-06-20 20:03 --- Oh, hmm ... looks like you're right: I was looking at the wrong function in objdump -- possibly because the functions somehow came out in a different order in the object file from the source file. Perhap

[Bug gcov-profile/40498] There is neither a negative form of -pg nor an __attribute__ to disable instrumentation of a specific function

-- naesten at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40498

[Bug gcov-profile/40498] New: There is neither a negative form of -pg nor an __attribute__ to disable instrumentation of a specific function

Version: 4.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: naesten at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i486-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i486-linux-gnu GCC

[Bug c/40356] New: "incompatible pointer type" warnings don't mention the actual types

us: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: naesten at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40356