[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

2021-04-12 Thread mss at tutanota dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 --- Comment #21 from mss at tutanota dot de --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) > I'm worried that there isn't enough time to find out before GCC11 release if > some packages in the wild aren't using that option. > E.g. I wonder wher

[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

2021-04-12 Thread mss at tutanota dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 --- Comment #10 from mss at tutanota dot de --- Turns out I was horribly wrong, apologies: >The x86-32 application binary interface specifies the size to be 96 bits, so >-m96bit-long-double is the default in 32-bit mode. >(https://gcc.gnu.org/

[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

2021-04-12 Thread mss at tutanota dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 --- Comment #9 from mss at tutanota dot de --- > To my knowledge -march=native on my Core2 Duo T8100 is enabled by default, > so I have it added to compile a native-like LLVM for it from another > computer. I meant to say that -m96bit-long-doubl

[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

2021-04-12 Thread mss at tutanota dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 --- Comment #8 from mss at tutanota dot de --- Apologies for the delay, had my account auto-locked. While I was waiting for the unlocking of my account, I tried removing flags one by one to see if that'd do a thing and turns out removing ``-m96b

[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

2021-04-12 Thread mss at tutanota dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 --- Comment #7 from mss at tutanota dot de --- Created attachment 50565 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50565&action=edit Verbose invocation of the cmdline args to reach the ICE.

[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

2021-04-12 Thread mss at tutanota dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 --- Comment #5 from mss at tutanota dot de --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > ... and what compiler options do you use please? Please paste output of > --verbose argument. 0 ~: gcc --verbose Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc C

[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

2021-04-12 Thread mss at tutanota dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 --- Comment #3 from mss at tutanota dot de --- Created attachment 50564 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50564&action=edit Preprocessed llvm/lib/Support/ItaniumManglingCanonicalizer.cpp

[Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

2021-04-12 Thread mss at tutanota dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 --- Comment #2 from mss at tutanota dot de --- Created attachment 50563 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50563&action=edit Preprocessed llvm/include/llvm/Demangle/ItaniumDemangle.h

[Bug c++/100041] New: ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022

2021-04-11 Thread mss at tutanota dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100041 Bug ID: 100041 Summary: ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4022 Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com