[Bug c++/116888] New: Incorrect lazy substitution into unevaluated context

2024-09-29 Thread mizvekov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116888 Bug ID: 116888 Summary: Incorrect lazy substitution into unevaluated context Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/116552] New: [ABI] Incorrect mangling for CTAD placeholder referencing template template parameter

2024-08-31 Thread mizvekov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116552 Bug ID: 116552 Summary: [ABI] Incorrect mangling for CTAD placeholder referencing template template parameter Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/114841] [P0522R0] partial ordering of template template parameters

2024-05-24 Thread mizvekov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114841 --- Comment #2 from Matheus Izvekov --- I published https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3310r0.html to address this problem, it has the most up-to-date wording. FYI the inconsistent deduction examples from problem #1 crash

[Bug c++/100385] New: overload resolution for function call expression on object selects `operator auto` conversion candidate.

2021-05-02 Thread mizvekov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100385 Bug ID: 100385 Summary: overload resolution for function call expression on object selects `operator auto` conversion candidate. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug target/79437] Redundant move instruction when getting sign bit of double on 32-bit architecture

2021-01-18 Thread mizvekov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79437 --- Comment #5 from Matheus Izvekov --- Issue is still present on 10.2 and trunk. Workspace for reference: https://godbolt.org/z/EYhaaW I believe this issue should have already been transitioned to CONFIRMED.

[Bug libstdc++/98605] [8/9/10 Regression] clang-tidy error parsing on libstdc++-v3

2021-01-13 Thread mizvekov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98605 --- Comment #12 from Matheus Izvekov --- Thank you!!!

[Bug libstdc++/98605] [8/9/10 Regression] clang-tidy error parsing on libstdc++-v3

2021-01-12 Thread mizvekov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98605 --- Comment #6 from Matheus Izvekov --- What clang-tidy version? From the date of the commit, it was probably no older than 6, probably 4 or 5. If that is too old and probably considered unsupported, I think that is fine. But even if in the end

[Bug libstdc++/98605] clang-tidy error parsing on libstdc++-v3

2021-01-09 Thread mizvekov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98605 --- Comment #1 from Matheus Izvekov --- By the way, FYII it is also possible to suppress clang-tidy specific diagnostics on specific lines with a "comment pragma", like so (untested): // NOLINT(bugprone-dangling-handle) // NOLINTNEXTLINE(bugpron

[Bug libstdc++/98605] New: clang-tidy error parsing on libstdc++-v3

2021-01-08 Thread mizvekov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98605 Bug ID: 98605 Summary: clang-tidy error parsing on libstdc++-v3 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstd