https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120760
Bug ID: 120760
Summary: Deducing array bound with a small unsigned integral
type silently overflows
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120759
Bug ID: 120759
Summary: Empty initializer list (`{}`) in a parameter pack
disables deduction for the entire pack
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120758
Bug ID: 120758
Summary: Empty initializer list (`{}`) incorrectly deduces an
array size for array reference parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105233
Mital Ashok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mital at mitalashok dot co.uk
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116442
Bug ID: 116442
Summary: ICE when calling immediate function in NSDMI with
aggregate initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116385
Bug ID: 116385
Summary: Unevaluated usage of function parameters with typeid
incorrectly considered odr-use
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116206
Bug ID: 116206
Summary: No failure when all C++20 prospective destructors are
not viable when templated class definition is
instantiated
Product: gcc
Version: 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116158
Bug ID: 116158
Summary: __INTn_TYPE__ macros unexpectedly unsigned with
-funsigned-bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115909
Bug ID: 115909
Summary: C++20 operator<=> explicitly defaulted but defined as
deleted after first declaration does not error
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52659
--- Comment #5 from Mital Ashok ---
(It compiles with a warning, but that is not promoted to an error even with
-pedantic, and the example shows how I think that accepting it even as an
extension is harmful)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52659
Mital Ashok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mital at mitalashok dot co.uk
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115807
Mital Ashok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115807
Bug ID: 115807
Summary: C++23 P0943R6 does't qualify std::atomic
in #define _Atomic properly
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94058
--- Comment #5 from Mital Ashok ---
Proposed patch doesn't seem to work with bool bit-fields (with width not-1):
```
struct X {
bool bf : 8;
} x;
signed char x_not_narrow{ x.bf };
```
Currently: Not narrowing
With patch:
```
test.cpp:4:29: w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115699
Bug ID: 115699
Summary: Anonymous structs should compare member-wise with
C++20 defaulted operator==
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94058
Mital Ashok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mital at mitalashok dot co.uk
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115583
Bug ID: 115583
Summary: Call to consteval function in `if consteval` immediate
function context rejected at -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115558
Bug ID: 115558
Summary: Trivial noexcept(false) default constructor does not
make value initialization potentially throwing
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497
Mital Ashok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115497
Bug ID: 115497
Summary: __is_pointer doesn't compile with clang since
014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226ee5b31e816c8b
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115476
--- Comment #7 from Mital Ashok ---
I think the issue is the same as it was in Clang
The preconditions for `has_unique_object_representations` is
https://eel.is/c++draft/type.traits#tab:meta.unary.prop-row-47-column-3-sentence-1
> T shall be a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115476
--- Comment #4 from Mital Ashok ---
cppreference is wrong
https://eel.is/c++draft/type.traits#tab:meta.unary.prop-row-47-column-2-sentence-1
> For an array type `T`, the same result as
> `has_unique_object_representations_v>`, otherwise see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115476
--- Comment #5 from Mital Ashok ---
Sorry, I misread the cppreference quote. Though it should be ill-formed instead
of UB I think.
GCC also crashes on this invalid code:
class Foo;
static_assert(__has_unique_object_representations(Foo[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115476
Bug ID: 115476
Summary: __has_unique_object_representation ICE with array of
uninstantiated type of unknown bound
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115251
Bug ID: 115251
Summary: [DR 1581] Conversion operator that is needed for
constant evaluation not instantiated in
requires-expression
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115187
--- Comment #5 from Mital Ashok ---
PR94264 prevented the first version from being an issue in GCC13, but the
second version
struct X { int x[2]; };
void f() {
delete X{}.x;
}
still crashed in older GCC versions. This isn't t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115187
Bug ID: 115187
Summary: ICE when deleting temporary array
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114977
Bug ID: 114977
Summary: C++20 parenthesized aggregate initialization
copy-inits from {} instead of value-init
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114937
--- Comment #3 from Mital Ashok ---
My real code looks more like:
void sat_inc(int& y) {
if (y < __INT_MAX__)
++y;
}
template
void f(int& x, F&&... functions) {
int copy = x;
(functions(copy), ...);
if (copy > x)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114937
Bug ID: 114937
Summary: [11 regression] -ftree-vrp optimizes out range check
before conditional increment
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114620
Bug ID: 114620
Summary: Pointer-to-member template argument which is the
member of a base class is rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114619
Bug ID: 114619
Summary: [14 regression] ICE with -fno-elide-constructors in
C++14 mode for non-constant initializer in array new
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68891
Mital Ashok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mital at mitalashok dot co.uk
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112908
Bug ID: 112908
Summary: __reference_{converts,constructs}_from_temporary
checks for move constructor when binding prvalue to
reference of the same type
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112590
Mital Ashok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mital at mitalashok dot co.uk
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112595
Bug ID: 112595
Summary: ICE on invalid code: Literal class NTTP aggregate
initialized with self-referential pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112594
Bug ID: 112594
Summary: Non-type template parameter created with converting
constructor sometimes has original type
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
37 matches
Mail list logo
