--- Comment #46 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-07 10:20
---
Created an attachment (id=13158)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13158&action=view)
Non-reversed patch to make configure test for comdat support work with binutils
snapshots
--
--- Comment #45 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-07 10:13
---
Created an attachment (id=13157)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13157&action=view)
Patch to configure test for comdat support work with binutils snapshots
gcc's configure tes
--- Comment #44 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-06 16:33
---
(In reply to comment #43)
> It means your gcc 4.1.1 was built with a very old binutils and it doesn't
> support COMDAT group
Yes, this gcc was build with binutils 2.15 from Debian Sarge.
Thanks
--- Comment #42 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-06 12:07
---
Created an attachment (id=13152)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13152&action=view)
Testcase (generated assembly files from gcc 4.1.1)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #40 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-05 16:20
---
Subject: Re: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> Can I reproduce it on Linux?
Using gcc 4.1.1 with binutils-070227 I can also reproduce it on Li
--- Comment #36 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-05 08:43
---
Subject: Re: Discarded Linkonce sections in .rodata
>> One possible workaround is to reorder the objects during link, so that those
>> with .gnu.linkonce.r.* come first.
>>
>> If thi
--- Comment #34 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2007-03-02 16:25
---
Could the be related to
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-08/msg00187.html?
I'm getting those linker errors with both gcc 4.1.1 and gcc 4.1.2 on
x86-Solaris with GNU ld from binutils-070227, but
--- Comment #5 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2006-04-24 09:26
---
Actually, gcc is installed both with *and* without "-X.Y.Z" on all machines
here except the Debian Linuxes (AIX, HP-UX, Solaris), but none of them carries
a g++ ending with "-X.Y.Z".
Accordi
--- Comment #3 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2006-02-21 16:21
---
Didn't help, same result with powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0-g++ (there is no
powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0-g++-4.0.2 here).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26397
--- Comment #1 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2006-02-21 15:57
---
Created an attachment (id=10887)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10887&action=view)
Preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26397
hen rethrowing exception
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: michael dot klein at fazi dot de
GCC bu
11 matches
Mail list logo
