[Bug libgcc/109685] [13/14 Regression] Memory leak in `__deregister_frame`

2023-09-27 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109685 Markus Böck changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/109685] New: Memory leak in `__deregister_frame`

2023-05-01 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109685 Bug ID: 109685 Summary: Memory leak in `__deregister_frame` Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug c++/104601] New: [11 Regression] Invalid branch elimination at -O2

2022-02-18 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104601 Bug ID: 104601 Summary: [11 Regression] Invalid branch elimination at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug other/100598] New: MinGW Canadian cross toolchain fails to build due to missing BASEVER in genversion.c

2021-05-14 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100598 Bug ID: 100598 Summary: MinGW Canadian cross toolchain fails to build due to missing BASEVER in genversion.c Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug libstdc++/100238] [11/12 Regression] Link failure in debug libstdc++ on MinGW due to atomicitiy.cc

2021-05-01 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100238 Markus Böck changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug libstdc++/100238] New: [11/12] Link failure in debug libstdc++ on MinGW due to atomicitiy.cc

2021-04-23 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100238 Bug ID: 100238 Summary: [11/12] Link failure in debug libstdc++ on MinGW due to atomicitiy.cc Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/98409] Installing g++-mapper-server fails when cross compiling to Windows

2020-12-21 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98409 --- Comment #2 from Markus Böck --- That is indeed weird. At the top of the Makefile it says: EXEEXT := .exe and further down in the Makefile: g++-mapper-server$(exeext): $(MAPPER.O) $(CODYLIB) +$(CXX) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(VERSION.O)

[Bug c++/98409] New: Installing g++-mapper-server fails when cross compiling to Windows

2020-12-21 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98409 Bug ID: 98409 Summary: Installing g++-mapper-server fails when cross compiling to Windows Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/97813] New: std::filesystem::equivalent returning incorrect results on MinGW due to symlinks

2020-11-12 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97813 Bug ID: 97813 Summary: std::filesystem::equivalent returning incorrect results on MinGW due to symlinks Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug c++/97740] New: Weird error message about accessing a private member of my own class inside of std::string_view inside of constexpr

2020-11-06 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740 Bug ID: 97740 Summary: Weird error message about accessing a private member of my own class inside of std::string_view inside of constexpr Product: gcc Version: 1

[Bug libstdc++/97729] [11 Regression] Link failure due to basic_stringbuf and others when building DLL on MinGW

2020-11-05 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97729 Markus Böck changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/97729] [11 Regression] Link failure due to basic_stringbuf and others when building DLL on MinGW

2020-11-05 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97729 --- Comment #4 from Markus Böck --- Indeed that sounds like it might be the issue. I am currently on a very recent version of binutils: $ ./x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld --versionGNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35.50.20200709

[Bug libstdc++/97729] [11 Regression] Link failure due to basic_stringbuf and others when building DLL on MinGW

2020-11-05 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97729 --- Comment #2 from Markus Böck --- Created attachment 49507 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49507&action=edit config.h Applied the patch and it fixed the issue regarding the undefined references. Still getting the multiple

[Bug libstdc++/97729] New: Link failure due to basic_stringbuf and others when building DLL on MinGW

2020-11-05 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97729 Bug ID: 97729 Summary: Link failure due to basic_stringbuf and others when building DLL on MinGW Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/97661] New: Bogus error message about initializing a using declaration

2020-11-01 Thread markus.boeck02 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97661 Bug ID: 97661 Summary: Bogus error message about initializing a using declaration Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio