--- Comment #3 from markhobley at yahoo dot co dot uk 2009-03-07 02:40
---
Subject: Re: invalid instructions accepted in inline assembly language on 32
bit machines
--- On Sat, 7/3/09, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
wrote:
> I got
>
> h...@gnu-9 tmp]$ gcc -march=i386 -
gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: markhobley at yahoo dot co dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39393
--- Comment #2 from markhobley at yahoo dot co dot uk 2009-01-27 00:36
---
Subject: Re: Additional switches to disallow processor supplementary
instructions
> --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
> 2009-01-26 19:15 ---
> I think this is a bad idea.
: markhobley at yahoo dot co dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38959
