https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92896
--- Comment #6 from MarkEggleston ---
This has been fixed, see comment 5.
I do not have permission to changes the status so somebody that does will need
to do so.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92896
--- Comment #4 from MarkEggleston ---
reduce_unary (arith (*eval) (gfc_expr *, gfc_expr **), gfc_expr *op,
gfc_expr **result)
{
gfc_constructor_base head;
gfc_constructor *c;
gfc_expr *r;
arith rc;
if (op->expr_type == EX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92896
--- Comment #3 from MarkEggleston ---
The value 'A' is padded out with spaces giving a value 2314885530818453554.
Avoiding the conversion and using the value directly:
program p
print *, [integer :: 1, [integer(8) :: 2314885530818453554]]
end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48303
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark.eggleston at codethink
dot co
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I've noticed a change in behaviour regarding the use of -fno-automati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89348
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89078
Bug 89078 depends on bug 89236, which changed state.
Bug 89236 Summary: Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by
GNU extension
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
Target Milestone: ---
This short program illustrates the problem:
program test
real*8 :: x = 9.0
write(*,*) x
end program test
when compiled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88079
--- Comment #6 from MarkEggleston ---
Where a module is used:
module foo
implicit none
interface
subroutine dusty(n)
integer :: n
end subroutine
end interface
contains
subroutine bar(n)
integer, intent(in) :: n
re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88079
--- Comment #5 from MarkEggleston ---
Given the program below:
program main
implicit none
integer :: n
n = 5
call bar(n)
end program main
subroutine bar(n)
integer, intent(in) :: n
real :: x
print *,"bar before dusty", n
call d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88079
--- Comment #4 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 46539
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46539&action=edit
Warn about missing intent or value
Work in progress. Warns at declaration, assignment and possible modification
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
--- Comment #9 from MarkEggleston ---
using -Wimplicit-interface helps:
7 | call dusty(n)
| 1
Warning: Procedure 'dusty' called with an implicit interface at (1)
[-Wimplicit-interface]
Adding in an interface block:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88079
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark.eggleston at codethink
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
--- Comment #7 from MarkEggleston ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> > Warning is output by gfortran 6.3.0.
> > ...
>
> Not a warning, but an error as it shall. This PR is different: it is about
> the case where the INTENT(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64958
--- Comment #5 from MarkEggleston ---
Warning is output by gfortran 6.3.0.
program test
implicit none
integer :: b
integer :: c
b = 0
c = 7
call sub(b)
call sub(c)
write(*,*) b, c
contains
subroutine sub(x)
integer, inte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89920
--- Comment #2 from MarkEggleston ---
Affects 7, 8 and trunk branches.
A do loop from 1 to the maximum value of an integer does not exit. The example
below has a check that forces the loop to exit.
program test
implicit none
integer(4) :: i
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
Target Milestone: ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89431
--- Comment #7 from MarkEggleston ---
The only reason this PR was raised was because an attempt to use conditional
compilation based on integer kinds failed because the implementation did not
match the documentation.
There is no issue with the e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89431
--- Comment #4 from MarkEggleston ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> program test
> use iso_fortran_env
> implicit none
> write(*,*) integer_kinds
> #ifdef __GFC_INT_1__
> write(*,*) "__GFC_INT_1__ defined"
> #else
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89431
--- Comment #2 from MarkEggleston ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> These macros have been introduced at revision r267464.
>
> Looking at the code I don't see why __GFC_REAL_* are defined, but not
> __GFC_INTEGER_*.
Look
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The integer macros specified in the "Preprocessing and conditional compilation"
section of the manual do not exist. The real macros on the other hand do.
On x86_64:
pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89348
--- Comment #1 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45715
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45715&action=edit
Change log for gcc/fortran for patch
Date has been omitted from change log. Can be added when committed.
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 45714
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45714&action=edit
Fortran options documentation fixes
Enabling of -fdec-inc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45556|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45604|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45554|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45658|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286
--- Comment #9 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45698
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45698&action=edit
GNU extension to intrinsic SIGN
Remove declaration of gfc_check_sign from intrinsic.h has it has been deleted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45550|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100
--- Comment #10 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45696
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45696&action=edit
Change Log for gcc/testsuite for patch
Replace -fdec-format-defaults with PR fortran/89100.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45603|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45548|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100
--- Comment #7 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45693
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45693&action=edit
Update to option and Extension documentation
Documentation changes in their own difference file so that they ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286
--- Comment #8 from MarkEggleston ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #5)
> Patch should go to the fort...@gcc.gnu.org and gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> mailing lists for review.
will do.
>
> From a quick look at the patch it does s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45659|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45657|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286
--- Comment #4 from MarkEggleston ---
Missed some changes that should've gone in the change log. These included a
couple of line that shouldn't have been there.
Fixing patch and change log and will replace attachments when done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286
--- Comment #3 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45659
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45659&action=edit
Change Log for gcc/testsuite for patch
Date to added later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286
--- Comment #2 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45658
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45658&action=edit
Change log for gcc/fortran for patch
Date to added later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89286
--- Comment #1 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45657&action=edit
GNU extension to intrinsic SIGN
Includes change to Intrinsic documentation.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The GNU extension allows different kinds to used in the actual arguments to
DIM, MOD, MODULO, MAX and MIN. The description of the arguments for SIGN are
the same as for DIM, MOD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45645|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240
--- Comment #3 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45646
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45646&action=edit
Change log for gcc/fortran for patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240
--- Comment #4 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45647
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45647&action=edit
Change Log for testsuite for patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240
--- Comment #2 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45645
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45645&action=edit
Fix return kind for max and min
Also includes update to the intrinsic documentation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
--- Comment #11 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45634
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45634&action=edit
Updated change log for gcc/fortran for patch
Change no longer affects MAX and MIN.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45629|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
--- Comment #9 from MarkEggleston ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5)
> (In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #3)
> > Looks like I missed MIN with literals.
> >
> > integer(2) :: a2
> > integer(4) :: a4
> > write(*,*) kind(max(7, 9
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Return kind differs when actual arguments are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
--- Comment #8 from MarkEggleston ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #7)
> (In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #0)
> > Created attachment 45626 [details]
> > Add GNU extension notes to DIM, MOD, MODULO, MAX and MIN
> >
> > Missing notes reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
--- Comment #6 from MarkEggleston ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5)
> (In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #3)
> > Looks like I missed MIN with literals.
> >
> > integer(2) :: a2
> > integer(4) :: a4
> > write(*,*) kind(max(7, 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45626|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
--- Comment #3 from MarkEggleston ---
Looks like I missed MIN with literals.
integer(2) :: a2
integer(4) :: a4
write(*,*) kind(max(7, 9_1))
write(*,*) kind(max(7_2, 9))
write(*,*) kind(max(a2, a4))
write(*,*) kind(min(7_2, 9))
write(*,*) kind(mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236
--- Comment #1 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45627
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45627&action=edit
Change log for gcc/fortran for patch
No date as it should inserted when patch is committed.
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 45626
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45626&action=edit
Add GNU ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #4|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100
MarkEggleston changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #45549|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
--- Comment #2 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45556
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45556&action=edit
Change Log for gc/testsuite for patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89103
--- Comment #1 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 4
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4&action=edit
Change log for gcc/fortran for patch
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 45554
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45554&action=edit
Patch to allow blank item in format
gfortran as of revision:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100
--- Comment #3 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45551
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45551&action=edit
Change Log for testsuite for patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100
--- Comment #2 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45550
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45550&action=edit
Change Log for libgfortran for patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89100
--- Comment #1 from MarkEggleston ---
Created attachment 45549
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45549&action=edit
Change log for gcc/fortran for patch
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 45548
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45548&action=edit
Patch to support
69 matches
Mail list logo
