http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
--- Comment #13 from mako 2012-05-28 21:04:25
UTC ---
Am I interpreting correctly that double braces are /required/ for std::array
init lists but only when the subtype has has a multivariable initializer too?
..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
--- Comment #7 from mako 2012-05-26 21:41:57
UTC ---
Uh, Johnathan said "4.6 correctly rejects it:", however 4.6's rejection message
appears every bit as useless as 4.7's, perhaps more so, because it
misattributes the error. If that's the correct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
--- Comment #5 from mako 2012-05-26 20:31:39
UTC ---
Would someone please explain to me why that compile error is considered
correct? It tells me nothing sensible.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494
Bug #: 53494
Summary: initializer lists in array type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51841
--- Comment #5 from mako 2012-01-13 02:05:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> void actv(vector::iterator in){
>
> You are missing the typename keyword.
Thanks a bunch, Andrew. I didn't know about this. The internet hasn't served as
a very goo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51841
--- Comment #3 from mako 2012-01-13 01:38:46
UTC ---
Created attachment 26311
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26311
simple code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51841
Bug #: 51841
Summary: iterator weirdness. I couldn't tell you what's going
on here
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED