https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91031
--- Comment #5 from Alexey Makhalov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> In previous versions of gcc, the compound literal was put in the function
> level scope rather than in the current scope. Which is why it worked
> previously.
: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: makhaloff at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I found this issue while compiling systemd-239 with gcc-9.3.0
The problem is in local data initialization on the stack such as array of
pointers to global data.
-O0 is fine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60307
--- Comment #2 from Alexey Makhalov ---
It's new processor architecture. It doesn't present in GCC sources.
I've took a look through all targets and figured out that there are no targets
who supports cc0 and conditional execution together. So it
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: makhaloff at gmail dot com
Created attachment 32193
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32193&action=edit
Support conditional ex
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: makhaloff at gmail dot com
Hello.
I'm porting gcc on some architecture which has complex addition, subtraction
and multiplication instructions.
I was trying to define addchi3, subchi3 but it doesn't work.
I've f
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: makhaloff at gmail dot com
Created attachment 31476
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31476&acti
-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: makhaloff at gmail dot com
gcc/coretypes.h contains TLS_MODEL_GLOBAL_DYNAMIC item in tls_model enum.
TLS GD model is called "General Dynamic" in a lot of documentation.
Some of them are listed below:
http://www.a
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: makhaloff at gmail dot com
Hello!
If delete_unmarked_insns deletes some insn, DF state might be
out of date, and, regs_ever_live might contain unused registers till the end
