[Bug c/55383] -Wcast-qual reports incorrect message

2014-03-18 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383 --- Comment #12 from Magnus Reftel --- Any suggestions on how to progress with this one?

[Bug c/55383] -Wcast-qual reports incorrect message

2014-03-11 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383 --- Comment #11 from Magnus Reftel --- No regressions seen. Sent en email with the patch to gcc-patches as requested ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00517.html ).

[Bug c/55383] -Wcast-qual reports incorrect message

2014-03-11 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383 --- Comment #10 from Magnus Reftel --- Applied Manuel López-Ibáñez's patch on top of trunk and tested Jeremy's testcase. Without the patch, the error message says that "__attribute__((noreturn))" is being cast away. With the patch, the error messa

[Bug c/55383] -Wcast-qual reports incorrect message

2014-03-10 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383 --- Comment #9 from Magnus Reftel --- Created attachment 32331 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32331&action=edit Patch from comment #1, updated to apply on trunk

[Bug c/55383] -Wcast-qual reports incorrect message

2014-03-10 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383 --- Comment #6 from Magnus Reftel --- Sorry, I'm not a GCC developer - just another user aflicted by the bug.

[Bug c/55383] -Wcast-qual reports incorrect message

2014-03-10 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55383 Magnus Reftel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||magnus.reftel at gmail dot com

[Bug preprocessor/56824] [4.8 regression] pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop fail with GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waggregate-return"

2014-02-10 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824 --- Comment #12 from Magnus Reftel --- Works fine on trunk (tested version 96c7d4b1727c5f9ddcbb02fb69f727a0f2f3572e).

[Bug preprocessor/56824] [4.8/4.9 regression] pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop fail with GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waggregate-return"

2014-02-06 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824 --- Comment #9 from Magnus Reftel --- Thanks for the patch! I applied it on top of 53c3c39b96df9c6a6368bf0d6acfd28a7af3cb63 and tested. Without the patch, the error was still printed when compiling the testcase. With the patch, the error was not

[Bug c/56824] pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop regression for GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waggregate-return"

2013-08-08 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824 Magnus Reftel changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.3 Known to fail|

[Bug gcov-profile/57234] gcov 4.7.3 segfaults when reading Clang's .gc* files.

2013-05-14 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57234 --- Comment #3 from Magnus Reftel --- I understand that gcov has no reason to handle coverage files written by anything other than its matching GCC version, but is a segfault a valid response to reading a malformed input file?

[Bug gcov-profile/57234] gcov 4.7.3 segfaults when reading Clang's .gc* files.

2013-05-10 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57234 --- Comment #1 from Magnus Reftel --- For reference: the Clang bug got ID 15954.

[Bug gcov-profile/57234] New: gcov 4.7.3 segfaults when reading Clang's .gc* files.

2013-05-10 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
y: P3 Component: gcov-profile Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: magnus.reftel at gmail dot com Created attachment 30087 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30087&action=edit hello world and its .gc* files which makes gcov segfault Gcov se

[Bug c/56824] pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop regression for GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waggregate-return"

2013-04-12 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824 --- Comment #4 from Magnus Reftel 2013-04-12 07:42:50 UTC --- Thanks for working on this! While the change (when applied to 4.8 as released) does make the erroneous print go away, it makes gcc hang with 100% CPU usage if the "diagnostic

[Bug c/56824] pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop regression for GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waggregate-return"

2013-04-10 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824 Magnus Reftel changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c/56824] pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop regression for GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waggregate-return"

2013-04-03 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824 Magnus Reftel changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29784|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/56824] New: pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop regression for GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waggregate-return"

2013-04-03 Thread magnus.reftel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56824 Bug #: 56824 Summary: pragma GCC diagnostic push/pop regression for GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waggregate-return" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0