https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67089
--- Comment #2 from Mike ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> We shouldn't do this, and it reflected in PR58779.
But can't we improve the logic to satisfy both pr58779 and pr67089? The
absolute metric is code quality, and with all due
: minor
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: m.mukovnikov at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Starting from 4.8.3, gcc does not optimize integer overflow and underflow
checks inserting a redundant cmp instruction
