https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95664
Ludovic Brenta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org
--- Comment
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org
Target Milestone: ---
Forwarding Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/812587
Please see below a minimal test case striped down
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40986
Ludovic Brenta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Known to work|4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40986
Ludovic Brenta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37110
Ludovic Brenta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX
ion: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org
Host: i386-linux-gnu
Target: i386-linux-gnu
Build: i386-linux-gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49944
--- Comment #5 from Ludovic Brenta 2011-08-04
10:21:20 UTC ---
OK, here is another patch which changes GCC to use s-taprop-posix.ad[bs] on
GNU/kFreeBSD. The changes in s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads are more extensive than
in the previous patch I sen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49940
--- Comment #2 from Ludovic Brenta 2011-08-02
17:39:02 UTC ---
I found that declaring lwp_self in s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads similarly to the
declaration in s-osinte-freebsd.ads fixed the problem. Patch submitted as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49944
--- Comment #3 from Ludovic Brenta 2011-08-02
17:30:43 UTC ---
I would not be so assertive as Arno. It seems to me (but I may be wrong) that
s-taprop-linux.adb really only calls glibc and libpthread, not the kernel, and
therefore should be calle
ferences follow)"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org
Host: x8
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org
Host: x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
Target: x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org
Target: powerpc-linux-gnu
This patch, committed in Subversion as revision 165921:
2010-10-25 Jose Ruiz
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49783
Ludovic Brenta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org
--- Comment
: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org
In gcc/gcc/ada, I just noticed that targparm.ads has the Runtime Library
Exception but targparm.adb does not. This has been the case since:
2005-12-05 Doug Rupp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32164
--- Comment #10 from Ludovic Brenta 2011-05-10
08:48:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> This works with 4.4.x and 4.5.x:
>
> pak1.ads:2:09: prefix of "Unrestricted_Access" attribute cannot be intrinsic
I wouldn't qualify this as "working".
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org
This bug was first reported on comp.lang.ada and confirmed:
package formalpkg is
generic
type T is private;
with procedure P (X : T
16 matches
Mail list logo