[Bug tree-optimization/118205] [15 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at is-a.h:255 with -O -floop-parallelize-all -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 since r15-6001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118205 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/114423] Incorrectly placed caret in the message about expanded _Pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114423 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/118205] [15 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at is-a.h:255 with -O -floop-parallelize-all -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 since r15-6001

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118205 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|[15 Regression] IC

[Bug tree-optimization/118205] [15 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at is-a.h:255 with -O -floop-parallelize-all -ftree-parallelize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118205 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/117970] [15 regression] RISC-V: xtreme-header failed to read compiled module: Bad file data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117970 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/117970] [15 regression] RISC-V: xtreme-header failed to read compiled module: Bad file data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117970 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug target/117970] [15 regression] RISC-V: xtreme-header failed to read compiled module: Bad file data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117970 --- Comment #6 from Lewis Hyatt --- I can reproduce that failure using your configuration to make cross compilers on an x86-64 host. The tests pass when a single arch is configured, there are just problems with multilib configuration. They also

[Bug target/117970] [15 regression] RISC-V: xtreme-header failed to read compiled module: Bad file data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117970 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug preprocessor/117118] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE with pragma message and raw strings since r11-498

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117118 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug preprocessor/114423] Incorrectly placed caret in the message about expanded _Pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114423 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | --- Comment #5 from Lewis Hyatt --- The

[Bug preprocessor/114423] Incorrectly placed caret in the message about expanded _Pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114423 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug preprocessor/117118] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE with pragma message and raw strings since r11-498

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117118 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug preprocessor/117118] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE with pragma message and raw strings since r11-498

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117118 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15 Regression]|[12/13/14/15 Regression]

[Bug preprocessor/117118] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE with pragma message and raw strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117118 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug preprocessor/114436] #pragma GCC system_header vs. _Pragma("GCC system_header")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114436 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug preprocessor/109704] #pragma {push,pop}_macro broken for identifiers that contain dollar signs at nonfirst positions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109704 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/64117] warning control #pragmas in precompiled headers are not obeyed for template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64117 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/115913] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE with pragma GCC pop_options with diagnostic since r11-1141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115913 --- Comment #8 from Lewis Hyatt --- I think they are for different things, push_options/pop_options is for saving and restoring the command line flags that get implied from switching optimization levels or target pragmas, while diagnostic pragma

[Bug middle-end/115913] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE with pragma GCC pop_options with diagnostic since r11-1141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115913 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug pch/115312] [14/15 Regression] ICE when including a PCH via compiler option -include since r14-5836

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115312 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/115312] [14/15 Regression] ICE when including a PCH via compiler option -include since r14-5836

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115312 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug pch/115312] [14/15 Regression] ICE when including a PCH via compiler option -include since r14-5836

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115312 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug pch/115312] [14/15 Regression] ICE when including a PCH via compiler option -include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115312 --- Comment #5 from Lewis Hyatt --- (In reply to Brecht Sanders from comment #4) > No, that patch wasn't added for my build, see my build recipe here: > https://github.com/brechtsanders/winlibs_recipes/blob/main/recipes/gcc.winlib Thanks, this

[Bug pch/115312] [14/15 Regression] ICE when including a PCH via compiler option -include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115312 --- Comment #3 from Lewis Hyatt --- (In reply to Brecht Sanders from comment #2) > I have made a native Windows MinGW-w64 build where the lines "gcc_assert > (!the_parser);" were commented out in file gcc/cp/parser.cc and got > confirmation this

[Bug pch/115312] [14/15 Regression] ICE when including a PCH via compiler option -include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115312 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug preprocessor/114436] #pragma GCC system_header vs. _Pragma("GCC system_header")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114436 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug preprocessor/114436] #pragma GCC system_header vs. _Pragma("GCC system_header")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114436 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/114423] Incorrectly placed caret in the message about expanded _Pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114423 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/111918] #pragma GCC diagnostic pop does not restore error status of -Wnarrowing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111918 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/110558] __has_include argument expansion results in unexpected filename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110558 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/80755] __has_include_next: internal compiler error: NULL directory in find_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80755 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/80755] __has_include_next: internal compiler error: NULL directory in find_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80755 --- Comment #6 from Lewis Hyatt --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > Thank you Lewis! > > Would you mind pinging this again? > > I've just started hitting this on glibc systems too as we added a wrapper to > a libbsd header (which I'm

[Bug preprocessor/105608] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in linemap_add with a really long defined macro on the command line r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug regression/113672] [14 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pch/line-map-3.C -g -I. -Dwith_PCH (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113672 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/105608] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in linemap_add with a really long defined macro on the command line r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608 --- Comment #13 from Lewis Hyatt --- I think I understand why it is platform dependent. The location being assigned to the restored macros is pfile->directive_line, which was stored relative to the original line map instance, before replacing it

[Bug preprocessor/105608] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in linemap_add with a really long defined macro on the command line r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608 --- Comment #11 from Lewis Hyatt --- Oh interesting. So the purpose of this test was just to record that GCC outputs incorrect locations for this case, I wanted to xfail it and then fix it properly for GCC 15. I did not consider that it might ou

[Bug preprocessor/105608] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in linemap_add with a really long defined macro on the command line r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma | |il/gcc-patches/2023-D

[Bug preprocessor/109704] #pragma {push,pop}_macro broken for identifiers that contain dollar signs at nonfirst positions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109704 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/80755] __has_include_next: internal compiler error: NULL directory in find_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80755 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-12-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug preprocessor/105608] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in linemap_add with a really long defined macro on the command line r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug preprocessor/110558] __has_include argument expansion results in unexpected filename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110558 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug preprocessor/110558] __has_include argument expansion results in unexpected filename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110558 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug pch/64117] warning control #pragmas in precompiled headers are not obeyed for template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64117 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||piannetta at kalrayinc dot com --- Comment

[Bug pch/112747] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overflow" has no effect in pre-compiled headers.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112747 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/112701] wrong type inference for ternary operator with `0/0u` in preprocessing context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112701 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug preprocessor/112701] wrong type inference for ternary operator with `0/0u` in preprocessing context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112701 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug preprocessor/112701] wrong type inference for ternary operator with `0/0u` in preprocessing context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112701 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug pch/112319] [14 Regression] segfault with pch and #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112319 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug pch/47857] Pragma once warning when compiling PCH

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47857 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org Resoluti

[Bug pch/9471] #pragma system_header vs. precompiled headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9471 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org Resolutio

[Bug c++/111918] #pragma GCC diagnostic pop does not restore error status of -Wnarrowing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111918 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug c++/111918] #pragma GCC diagnostic pop does not restore error status of -Wnarrowing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111918 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug pch/64117] warning control #pragmas in precompiled headers are not obeyed for template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64117 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Severity|normal

[Bug pch/112319] [14 Regression] segfault with pch and #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112319 --- Comment #2 from Lewis Hyatt --- Patch sent for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/634931.html

[Bug pch/112319] segfault with pch and #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112319 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfir

[Bug preprocessor/91517] Pragma expansion in variadic macro reorders pragmas and breaks code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91517 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||duparq at free dot fr --- Comment #7 from

[Bug preprocessor/79948] _Pragma(“GCC error”) is processed differently inside and outside of a #if directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79948 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug preprocessor/47254] ICE: unspellable token PRAGMA_EOL with #pragma redefine_extname and -fdirectives-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47254 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug preprocessor/108244] [13 Regression] `pragma GCC diagnostic` and -E -fdirectives-only causes the preprocessor to become confused since r13-1544-ge46f4d7430c52104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108244 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpewhacker at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug preprocessor/91152] endif-label error when using #pragma with -fdirectives-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91152 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/87299] #pragma GCC target behaves differently when using -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87299 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug preprocessor/36887] Please report #pragma GCC poison" location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36887 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89038] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunknown-pragmas" does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89038 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug preprocessor/82335] Incorrect _Pragma expansion if macro passed to another macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82335 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89038] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunknown-pragmas" does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89038 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org Stat

[Bug preprocessor/82335] Incorrect _Pragma expansion if macro passed to another macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82335 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-10-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug preprocessor/36887] Please report #pragma GCC poison" location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36887 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug preprocessor/90400] _Pragma not always expanded in the right location within macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90400 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paboyle at ph dot ed.ac.uk --- Comment #11

[Bug preprocessor/91517] Pragma expansion in variadic macro reorders pragmas and breaks code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91517 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/90400] _Pragma not always expanded in the right location within macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90400 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/61474] ICE (segfault) in preprocessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61474 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org Stat

[Bug c++/102409] _pragma ("omp ...") expansion issue - placed in the wrong scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102409 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/90400] _Pragma not always expanded in the right location within macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90400 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/87299] #pragma GCC target behaves differently when using -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87299 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug preprocessor/103902] GCC requires a space between string-literal and identifier in a literal-operator-id where the identifier is not in basic character set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902 --- Comment #9 from Lewis Hyatt --- Thanks, sorry about that, I need to replace "unsigned long" with "size_t". Will fix it.

[Bug preprocessor/103902] GCC requires a space between string-literal and identifier in a literal-operator-id where the identifier is not in basic character set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug preprocessor/109704] #pragma {push,pop}_macro broken for identifiers that contain dollar signs at nonfirst positions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109704 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/66290] wrong location for -Wunused-macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66290 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug preprocessor/105608] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in linemap_add with a really long defined macro on the command line r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608 --- Comment #2 from Lewis Hyatt --- When a PCH file is restored, the global line_maps instance is replaced with the one that was stored in the PCH file. Hence any locations that were generated prior to restoring the PCH file need to be added bac

[Bug preprocessor/67046] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Segmentation fault when a preprocessor directive follows the argument to _Pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67046 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug preprocessor/67046] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Segmentation fault when a preprocessor directive follows the argument to _Pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67046 --- Comment #5 from Lewis Hyatt --- The patch was submitted for review here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609951.html

[Bug preprocessor/67046] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Segmentation fault when a preprocessor directive follows the argument to _Pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67046 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug preprocessor/108244] [13 Regression] `pragma GCC diagnostic` and -E -fdirectives-only causes the preprocessor to become confused since r13-1544-ge46f4d7430c52104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108244 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/108244] [13 Regression] `pragma GCC diagnostic` and -E -fdirectives-only causes the preprocessor to become confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108244 --- Comment #8 from Lewis Hyatt --- Here is the patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/609275.html

[Bug preprocessor/108244] [13 Regression] `pragma GCC diagnostic` and -E -fdirectives-only causes the preprocessor to become confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108244 --- Comment #7 from Lewis Hyatt --- The testcases mentioned so far in this PR (the original report, and the reduction in Comment 5) started failing in r13-1544, because that revision added #pragma GCC diagnostic to the set of pragmas that are re

[Bug preprocessor/108244] [13 Regression] `pragma GCC diagnostic` and -E -fdirectives-only causes the preprocessor to become confused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108244 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug bootstrap/107722] [13 Regression] Bootstrap failure for some locales starting with r13-4070

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107722 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug preprocessor/55971] Preprocessor macros with C++11 raw string literals fail to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55971 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug preprocessor/97498] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-function" inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97498 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e...@coeus-group.com --- Comment #12 from

[Bug c/95239] Unable to ignore -Wattribute-warning in macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95239 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85153] _Pragma to disable -Wswitch-unreachable diagnostic not properly working when used within preprocessor macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85153 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug c/91669] #pragma's and _Pragma's work but _Pragma's used in an equivalent macro don't

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91669 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||falemagn at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 f

[Bug c++/85266] Inconsistent _Pragma behavior for macro with and without arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85266 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org Stat

[Bug preprocessor/60014] Bad warning suppression caused by track-macro-expansion when not using integrated cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60014 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89549] [10/11/12/13 Regression] -Wmisleading-indentation is disabled from this point onwards, since column-tracking was disabled due to the size of the code/headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549 --- Comment #25 from Lewis Hyatt --- This patch would make the note controllable via #pragma GCC diagnostic in the same way as the warning is: = diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-indentation.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-indentation.cc index 85a3ae1b303..3b

[Bug preprocessor/60014] Bad warning suppression caused by track-macro-expansion when not using integrated cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60014 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lhyatt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug c++/55578] Disabling warnings inside macro definition doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55578 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55578] Disabling warnings inside macro definition doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55578 --- Comment #11 from Lewis Hyatt --- (In reply to Vadim Zeitlin from comment #10) > There definitely was a change in behaviour in gcc 11 because I had to make > this change > > https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/commit/ > 95c98a0b5ff71caca66

[Bug preprocessor/83256] inconsistent _Pragma behavior in multi-line macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83256 Lewis Hyatt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 103036, which changed state. Bug 103036 Summary: incorrect #pragma GCC diagnostic suppression for macro expansion and -Wuninitialized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103036 What|Removed

  1   2   >