https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #24 from Leo Yuriev ---
So, seems that all done and this issue should be closed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
--- Comment #19 from Leo Yuriev ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #4)
> The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a64468a3034dd8e2d0794a5be84b8da544ffe2c3
>
> commit r10-7770-ga64468a3034dd8e2d0794
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: leo at yuriev dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Today Andrey Karpov published a short article with the latest results of
checking GCC source code using the PVS-Studio static analyzer.
Andrey writes that he received a lot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93243
--- Comment #5 from Leo Yuriev ---
Created attachment 47658
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47658&action=edit
testcase makefile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93243
--- Comment #4 from Leo Yuriev ---
Created attachment 47657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47657&action=edit
testcase source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93243
--- Comment #3 from Leo Yuriev ---
> (a) < (b) is not equal to ((a) - (b) < 0)
> Compiler will trait them differently.
Yes, of course. Moreover, in the second case, correct sorting requires limiting
the range of keys to avoid overflow when compar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93243
Leo Yuriev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|missed-optimization |
Target|x86_64
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: leo at yuriev dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Briefly:
./heapsort-bench, cc 9.2.1 20191008
pass 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68660
--- Comment #2 from Leo Yuriev ---
Hm, it is a devel-status of 5.3, not 5.2
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: web
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: leo at yuriev dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
"Release Series and Status" on the top of https://gcc.gnu.org/
- now see "GCC 5.2 (changes)"
- but should be "GCC 5.3 (changes)"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55930
Bug #: 55930
Summary: libatomic build failure if configured with
--disable-dependency-tracking
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55929
Bug #: 55929
Summary: lra-constraints-ICE while xg++ compile libitm with -Os
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
Leo Yuriev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leo at yuriev dot ru
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54277
Leo Yuriev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leo at yuriev dot ru
--- Comment #2 from
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: leo at yuriev dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31192
15 matches
Mail list logo