https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #21 from Laurent GUERBY ---
I'm not familiar with mips ABIs but on gcc mips machine there's 32 bit code.
root@erpro8-fsf1:~# file /bin/ls
/bin/ls: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, MIPS, MIPS-II version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
linked (uses sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
--- Comment #18 from Laurent GUERBY ---
Marxin, you have a cfarm account and access to gcc22 / 23 / 24 which are mips64
machines. If you need to change ssh keys see here:
https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/login/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496
Laurent GUERBY changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #14 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42519
--- Comment #7 from Laurent GUERBY ---
debian etch is an obsolete OS now so feel free to close, I no longer have an
etch system around to test anyway :).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373
Laurent GUERBY changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
Laurent GUERBY changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
--- Comment #6 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-02-15
22:43:17 UTC ---
For reference a verbose version of the testsuite warnings that cause FAIL. I
will deactivate fortran in my future builds because otherwise the
gcc-testresults@ mail is too big and get
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
--- Comment #4 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-02-15
14:17:09 UTC ---
Tobias, the patch you mentionned did allow bootstrap with c,fortran and without
disabling libquadmath for gcc version 4.6.0 20110212 (experimental) [trunk
revision 170072] (GCC).
Fee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
--- Comment #2 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-02-13
21:01:40 UTC ---
--disable-libquadmath-support was enough to build.
However gfortran test results are pretty poor:
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes24669
# o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47716
Summary: libgfortran quadmath_weak.h not found on NetBSD 5.1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939
--- Comment #20 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-02-07
21:42:25 UTC ---
Thanks Joel for the acats.log.
from the failing test list my guess is that tasking is broken and was working
for your previous test.
All tests with an Ada task in them fail with "
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939
--- Comment #16 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-02-07
06:10:13 UTC ---
Joel, could you send me the compressed acats.log or at least post the failing
tests? 335 failures likely mean one Ada feature is broken.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
--- Comment #10 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-01-10
09:37:23 UTC ---
Thanks Eric :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00728.html
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jan 8 23:02:58 UTC 2011 (revision 168603)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL:cb1010c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #17 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-01-08
22:48:51 UTC ---
For reference ACATS is now clean on arm-linux as well:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00648.html
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jan 7 00:49:12 UTC 2011 (revision 168562)
Nati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #6 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-01-04
12:18:49 UTC ---
The autotesters should pick this change within a day or two.
,
||laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #2 from Laurent GUERBY 2011-01-04
07:05:37 UTC ---
Add Ada maintainer in CC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
--- Comment #4 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-12-29
16:51:43 UTC ---
Look like .Ldebug_info0 symbol handling changed recently:
2010-11-13 Iain Sandoe
* dwarf2out.c (macinfo_entry): New struct.
(output_comp_unit): Emit the section start lab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47121
--- Comment #1 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-12-29
16:21:04 UTC ---
Note: c only bootstrap succeeds when following the same protocol.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47121
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [Ada] c,ada compiler unable to
rebootstrap itself once installed due to missing
.Ldebug_info0 symbol at link of stage1 gnat1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #2 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-12-29
15:56:24 UTC ---
As of r168294 C62002A:
-O0: PASS
-O1: PASS
-O2: FAIL
-O3: FAIL
On gcc56 PATH=/home/guerby/install-trunk-168294/bin:$PATH
if you want access to a compiler, the test is gnatchopped i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
--- Comment #2 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-12-28
08:48:11 UTC ---
Reduced test case:
procedure C390002 is
type Object is tagged null record;
begin
null;
end C390002;
gue...@babe:~/tmp$ gnatmake -f -O1 c390002.adb
gcc -c -O1 c390002.adb
gnat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Laurent GUERBY changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Summary: [4.6 Regression] 10 Ada ACATS tests fail to link with
undefined reference on ia64-linux
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: link-failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
--- Comment #1 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-12-23
10:27:54 UTC ---
on sparc32-linux (--with-cpu=v8) bootstrap and gnatlib work fine:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-12/msg02070.html
So this is a 64 bits issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
Summary: [4.6 Regression] gnatlib ICE on sparc64-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ACATS c62002a wrong code on arm-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46738
Laurent GUERBY changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040
--- Comment #6 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-11-23
18:29:43 UTC ---
I see the same errors, the patch has:
+# define INIT_ARRAY_SECTION_ASM_OP ARM_EABI_CTORS_SECTION_OP
+# define FINI_ARRAY_SECTION_ASM_OP ARM_EABI_DTORS_SECTION_OP
So might be rel
||2010.11.16 13:36:34
CC||laurent at guerby dot net
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-11-16
13:36:34 UTC ---
Any reason why this patch isn't submitted/commited?
I still ge
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #81 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-10-12
17:43:19 UTC ---
Now testing r165387 + Paolo patch as this seems to be the last PR preventing
bootstrap on arm-linux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445
--- Comment #25 from Laurent GUERBY 2010-09-29
07:08:58 UTC ---
On armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi with this patch at r164682 I still hit
PR44970 so bootstrap failed.
Mikael what made your bootstrap succeed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
Laurent GUERBY changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa64-*-* |hppa64-*-* arm-linux
--- Comment #80 fro
--- Comment #16 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-09-19 16:54 ---
expmed.c:make_tree has some non deterministic calls:
tree
make_tree (tree type, rtx x)
{
...
case PLUS:
return fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type, make_tree (type, XEXP (x, 0)),
make_tree
--- Comment #11 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-09-16 11:49 ---
With --with-arch=armv5te --with-tune=xscale I get the comparison failure.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445
--- Comment #10 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-09-14 20:04 ---
Ok will do.
Note: arm.c:arm_reload_in_hi() seems to have a few non deterministic calls to
gen_rtx_*, eg:
emit_insn (gen_zero_extendqisi2 (gen_rtx_SUBREG (SImode, operands[0], 0
--- Comment #8 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-09-14 19:19 ---
With 4.4.2 as base on gcc57 (and your PR45444 patch) I don't see the comparison
failure:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg01282.html
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #12 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-09-03 06:25 ---
The bootstrap is still broken on arm-linux, I opened a new report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45514
And I'm closing this one.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Re
iority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
GCC build triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi
GCC host triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi
GCC target triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45514
--- Comment #11 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-09-02 14:29 ---
Last succesful arm bootstrap for my tester is r163026.
At r163046 it fails with :
<<
/home/guerby/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/guerby/build/./prev-gcc/
-B/n/57/guerby/install-trunk-163046/armv5tel-unknown
--- Comment #8 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-08-01 09:53 ---
As of r162787 bootstrap goes a bit further then fails on compare in
stage3-bubble:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.o differs
make[2
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
GCC build triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi
GCC host triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi
GCC target triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45138
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
GCC build triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
GC
--- Comment #8 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-07-13 16:05 ---
Should be fixed now.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-07-03 07:13 ---
Patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg00236.html
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-07-02 06:50 ---
Non debug baktrace:
(gdb) r -fpreprocessed expmed.i -quiet -dumpbase expmed.i -auxbase expmed -g
-O2 -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-07-02 06:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=21059)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21059&action=view)
expmed.i
expmed.i
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44768
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
GCC build triplet: arm-li
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-06-15 09:58 ---
Reverting Steven patch with your fix is enough to get back bootstrap:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-06/msg01497.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44458
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-06-12 14:39 ---
Fixing by reverting Steven patch is not enough to regain bootstrap on arm, here
is the error during stage2:
/home/guerby/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/guerby/build/./prev-gcc/
-B/n/57/guerby/install-trunk-160646
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-06-10 09:56 ---
>From the ChangeLog this patch looks like a good candidate:
+2010-06-01 Jan Hubicka
+
+ * tree-cfgcleanup.c (fixup_noreturn_call): Break out from ...;
+ remove return value.
--
laurent at guerby
t: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44493
arm_float_words_big_endian implicit
declaration when Ada on arm-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
Re
`/home/guerby/build'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
bootstrap worked at rev 159862 fails at rev 159959.
--
Summary: bootstrap fails on mips-linux CHOOSE_DYNAMIC_LINKER
macro
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-06-06 12:35 ---
The Ada language build issues were all adressed by my patch on june 2009 here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-06/msg00635.html
The patch for your problem is the gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in change to
use -A
nt: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
GCC build triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44427
--- Comment #9 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-05-11 09:23 ---
For __always_inline the answer seems to be yes if I don't misinterpret the
source:
res = _fpmul_parts (&a, &b, &tmp);
static inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) const fp_number_type *
--- Comment #8 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-05-11 09:18 ---
(gdb) p *to
$4 = {decl = 0x2ad21800, callees = 0x2ac7e280, callers = 0x0, next =
0x2adf38e0, previous = 0x2adf2760, indirect_calls = 0x0, origin = 0x0, nested =
0x0, next_nested = 0x0, next_needed = 0x0
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-05-11 08:50 ---
(gdb) l
203 static int
204 cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining (int times, struct cgraph_node *to,
205 struct cgraph_node *what)
206 {
207 int size = (what
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-05-11 08:47 ---
backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x13b2f720 "in %s, at %s:%d") at
../../trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:755
#1 0x10837bd4 in fancy_abort (file=0x13cac5e8 "../../trunk/gcc/ipa-inline.c"
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-05-11 08:15 ---
Native bootstrap on mips-linux fails with the same ICE:
...
/n/42/guerby/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/n/42/guerby/build/./gcc/
-B/n/42/guerby/install-trunk-159243/mips64el-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/n/42/guerby/insta\
ll-trunk
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-03-21 19:56 ---
Summary work/fail.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-03-20 19:26 ---
I haven't built 4.3 in a while, if this is fixed in 4.4 and 4.5 it's good
enough for me so feel free to close as WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38696
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-03-15 17:36 ---
As Matthias said this is a --with-mode=thumb issue, people not using this
option have no issue bootstraping natively on arm:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-03/msg01254.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
--- Comment #10 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-02-28 09:05 ---
Fixed on arm-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg02695.html
powerpc-linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg02720.html
Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-02-19 12:17 ---
Note: c87b39a also fails on sparc-linux 32 bits but not 64 bits
sparc http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg01785.html
sparc64 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg01689.html
--
http
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-02-17 11:57 ---
For reference c87b39a on powerpc-linux:
^M
,.,. C87B39A ACATS 2.5 10-02-17 00:06:47^M
C87B39A OVERLOADING RESOLUTION FOR ALLOCATORS.^M
^M
raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : c87b39a.adb:93 discriminant check failed^M
Still
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-02-16 17:43 ---
Might be related to the same patch on powerpc-linux two different ACATS started
FAILing around the same time:
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jan 29 08:20:22 UTC 2010 (revision 156342)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-01
urent at guerby dot net
GCC build triplet: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
GCC host triplet: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
GCC target triplet: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43096
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-01-20 21:59 ---
I tested 4.4.1 on x86_64-linux and it seems not to crash:
gue...@gcc13:~/pr42816$ PATH=/opt/cfarm/release/4.4.1/bin:$PATH
gue...@gcc13:~/pr42816$ gnatmake world_test_main.adb
gcc -c world_test_main.adb
gcc -c
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-01-18 08:41 ---
Same result for me with 4.4.3 RC1. backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x004ca580 in copy_virtual_operands ()
Current language: auto; currently asm
(gdb) bt
#0 0x004ca580 in
n-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
GCC build triplet: sparc-linux
GCC host triplet: sparc-linux
GCC target triplet: sparc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42775
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-12-28 17:55 ---
Yes likely a distro header bug as I said: "Now may be it's a bug in debian etch
libc headers but it would be nice to honor --disable-werror in libgomp."
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42519
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-12-28 17:47 ---
"The second issue is how libgomp configure detects availability of
pthread_{attr,}_{get,set}affinity_np. It uses link test and does not pass -Wall
-Werror to compiler; thus, libgomp build fails if those function
://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-02/msg00302.html
--
Summary: bootstrap fails on powerpc64-linux because of libgomp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
--- Comment #27 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-12-27 13:37 ---
Hi,
Is the following page up to date?
http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-12-08 22:41 ---
Note: armv7l 4.4.2 also fails:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-12/msg00749.html
Discussions on the topic.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg01495.html
Doug?
--
laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-11-24 20:52 ---
Confirmed and this is a regression from 4.3.
$ gcc -c timer3.adb
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.5.0 20091109 (experimental) [trunk revision 154026]
(x86_64-unknown
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-11-23 09:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=19089)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19089&action=view)
Patch for hpux11
Dave, could try this patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42153
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-11-23 09:06 ---
hpux11 mixes its own s-osinte spec with the posix body hence the issue:
ifeq ($(strip $(filter-out hppa% hp hpux11%,$(targ))),)
s-osinte.adbhttp://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42153
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-11-22 11:46 ---
Original FAIL message:
,.,. C9A009G ACATS 2.5 09-11-18 11:59:26
C9A009G MASTER COMPLETED BUT NOT TERMINATED.
raised STORAGE_ERROR : s-intman.adb:139 explicit raise
The following tests FAIL the exact same way
--- Comment #12 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-11-17 08:15 ---
This patch was simply not reviewed/discussed at all, Arnaud could you have a
look? gcc-patches submission URL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01510.html
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
GCC build triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41870
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-10-05 21:15 ---
Not set for gnat1 (Ada):
(gdb) b gate_lto_out
Breakpoint 1 at 0xedd700: file ../../trunk/gcc/lto-streamer.c, line 803.
(gdb) r -quiet -dumpbase p.adb -auxbase p -O3 -flto -mtune=generic p.adb -o
/tmp/cclbAgyw.s
P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41593
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-10-05 13:19 ---
Andrew, did you reproduce it? If not what's missing/would help?
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #10 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-10-01 19:37 ---
Starting with
$ /tmp/gcc-4.4.1-install/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
Configured with: /home/mikpe/gcc-4.4.1/configure
--prefix=/tmp/gcc-4.4.1-install --with-arch=armv5te --with
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-29 13:38 ---
Together with PR41493 these are the only two ACATS fail on arm-linux as of rev
152122:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-09/msg02662.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41325
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-29 13:32 ---
This happens also on arm-linux at rev 152122
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-09/msg02662.html
.,. C34006G ACATS 2.5 09-09-28 14:27:54^M
C34006G CHECK THAT THE REQUIRED PREDEFINED OPERATIONS ARE DECLARED
--- Comment #15 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-28 19:01 ---
testcase fixed on trunk by:
2009-09-28 Olivier Hainque
ada/
* gcc-interface/targtyps.c (get_target_default_allocator_alignment):
Account for observable alignments out of default allocators
--- Comment #11 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-25 17:44 ---
Oh, I didn't realize Test_Extension'Alignment was 16, I wonder what causes it
to be super-aligned, I see no obvious candidate from -gnatR2...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41100
--- Comment #9 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-25 17:03 ---
Thanks for your analysis! I'm curious at what's going wrong: it looks scary to
have wrong code in such a simple use case :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41100
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-24 17:44 ---
Eric, do you have an idea on what could be wrong here? -gnatDG output looks
fine, the bug is present at all optimization level so may be it's gigi?
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-24 16:48 ---
Same issue on x86_64-linux with gcc version 4.5.0 20090924 (experimental)
[trunk revision 152124] (GCC)
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-24 15:51 ---
It's not a double free: free is called once but not with the pointer returned
by malloc, it is passed for some reason the pointer returned by malloc + 0x10.
valgrind detects it when it reports: "Address 0x5b3
--- Comment #8 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-20 16:59 ---
Given s-taprop-posix code it's obvious that Page_Size cannot be zero:
-- Round stack size as this is required by some OSes (Darwin)
Adjusted_Stack_Size := Adjusted_Stack_Size + Page_Siz
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-20 16:28 ---
from s-osinte-rtems.adb:
function Get_Page_Size return size_t is
begin
return 0;
end Get_Page_Size;
May be this value wasn't used before...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41419
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-20 15:33 ---
Ada code in s-taprop-posix.adb
Result := pthread_attr_init (Attributes'Access);
pragma Assert (Result = 0 or else Result = ENOMEM);
if Result /= 0 then
Succeeded := False;
r
--- Comment #60 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-13 21:44 ---
Ok I filed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41349
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241
e on sparc-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
GCC build triplet: spa
1 - 100 of 743 matches
Mail list logo
