[Bug lto/50687] Missing symbols with -flto -fvisibility=hidden on 4.6.x but not on 4.7.0

2011-10-11 Thread lat at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50687 --- Comment #4 from Lassi Tuura 2011-10-11 12:00:47 UTC --- Right, as far as I can tell at the moment visibility option is somewhat peripheral to the issue. The main difference you see with LTO vs. no LTO appears to be whether code for the type is

[Bug lto/50687] Missing symbols with -flto -fvisibility=hidden on 4.6.x but not on 4.7.0

2011-10-11 Thread lat at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50687 Lassi Tuura changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lat at cern dot ch --- Comment #1 from

[Bug lto/48384] lto, linker-plugin and optimization clutter the stack trace

2011-05-14 Thread lat at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48384 Lassi Tuura changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lat at cern dot ch --- Comment #6 from

[Bug middle-end/48597] x86-64 unwind register save location misses half-register write?

2011-04-14 Thread lat at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597 --- Comment #8 from Lassi Tuura 2011-04-15 05:40:33 UTC --- I confirm glibc 2.13 built with gcc 4.6.1 20110408 snapshot patched with gcc46-pr48597.patch results in correct unwind info for __ieee754_lgammaf_r. I checked all the locations using (v)m

[Bug c/48597] x86-64 unwind register save location misses half-register write?

2011-04-14 Thread lat at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597 --- Comment #1 from lat at cern dot ch 2011-04-14 07:53:27 UTC --- For completeness I didn't look for unwind inaccuracies with half-register writes other than the exact form "(v)movd %xmmN,%ebp". It's entirely possible this b

[Bug c/48597] New: x86-64 unwind register save location misses half-register write?

2011-04-13 Thread lat at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597 Summary: x86-64 unwind register save location misses half-register write? Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug middle-end/43498] No unwind info for thunks even with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables

2010-03-23 Thread lat at cern dot ch
--- Comment #6 from lat at cern dot ch 2010-03-23 19:04 --- Changing subject to be more descriptive of the actual bug. -- lat at cern dot ch changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/43498] -fasynchronous-unwind-tables does not seem to do anything

2010-03-23 Thread lat at cern dot ch
--- Comment #5 from lat at cern dot ch 2010-03-23 18:58 --- OK, reopening bug then. -- lat at cern dot ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/43498] -fasynchronous-unwind-tables does not seem to do anything

2010-03-23 Thread lat at cern dot ch
--- Comment #3 from lat at cern dot ch 2010-03-23 18:54 --- Ah, that would explain it. Does it mean that all omissions and inaccuracies in unwind information are bugs? Like the lack of unwind info for thunks? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43498

[Bug c++/43498] -fasynchronous-unwind-tables does not seem to do anything

2010-03-23 Thread lat at cern dot ch
--- Comment #2 from lat at cern dot ch 2010-03-23 18:52 --- Created an attachment (id=20174) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20174&action=view) Random C source file for testing Random C source file for additional testing. Compile on Linux with and

[Bug c++/43498] New: -fasynchronous-unwind-tables does not seem to do anything

2010-03-23 Thread lat at cern dot ch
ot seem to do anything Product: gcc Version: 4.3.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lat at cern dot ch GCC bui