https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
--- Comment #20 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #19)
> I assume this didn't make it into a 4.8 release?
That the bug didn't make it, I mean.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
--- Comment #19 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
I assume this didn't make it into a 4.8 release?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larryv at macports dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34009|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34008|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34007|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33976|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33977|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33975|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33970|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33969|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33975|updated trunk patch that|patch against trunk for
desc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33968|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #7 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #6)
> ../../gcc-5-20141114/gcc/config/darwin-c.c: In function ‘const char*
> version_as_modern_macro(const long unsigned int*)’:
> ../../gcc-5-20141114/gcc/config/darwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #52 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Attachment 33932 should be superseded by attachment 33970 from bug 63810.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #5 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Created attachment 33970
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33970&action=edit
patch against 4.8 branch for handling deployment targets correctly
This patch incorporates and supersedes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #4 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Created attachment 33969
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33969&action=edit
patch against 4.9 branch for handling deployment targets correctly
Patched GCC 4.9.2 matched the behavior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #3 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Created attachment 33968
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33968&action=edit
patch against trunk for handling deployment targets correctly
This is more of a rewrite than just a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #2 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #1)
> Larry said that he's working on a patch to fix this for gcc trunk, and I
> suspect he's pretty close to having something since that was about a w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #39 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #38)
> 2) You should report this bug upstream.
>
> http://compiler-rt.llvm.org
On second thought, they probably won't accept it because the patch is inva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #38 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Created attachment 33464
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33464&action=edit
Corrected dirent patch
Couple of things:
1) The version of Sanitizer included with GCC 4.9.1 at least, a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #37 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Okay, what I said initially was correct. This was the specific change I made.
https://gist.github.com/larryv/9b1cd34a34733c10f734
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #36 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #34)
> I got the build to succeed by changing
>
> # if defined(_DARWIN_FEATURE_64_BIT_INODE)
>
> to
>
> # if ! defined(__DARWIN_64_BIT_INO_T) || _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #35 from Lawrence Velázquez ---
Created attachment 33461
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33461&action=edit
MacPorts log from a failed attempt to build libgcc @4.9.1_0 (x86_64)
There’s a lot of text, I know. To se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||larryv at macports dot org
25 matches
Mail list logo
