http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
--- Comment #8 from Lubos Lunak ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> Which are the relevant classes? It seems to me that we want to tag almost
> everything except a few RAII types such as std::lock_guard and
> std::unique_lock, whi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
--- Comment #5 from Lubos Lunak ---
Gcc patch is in, r200941.
Keeping open for libstdc++ to use the attribute for its relevant classes. I can
try to submit a patch when I find the time, but I doubt I'll get past the most
obvious classes, so anyon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
--- Comment #2 from Lubos Lunak 2012-11-04 11:04:52
UTC ---
Created attachment 28609
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28609
gcc patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
Lubos Lunak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
Bug #: 55203
Summary: No unused warning for variables of non-trivial types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
