https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102577
Krzysztof Małysa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102577
--- Comment #2 from Krzysztof Małysa ---
Could you explain why this is correct? For example, quoting a relevant part of
the C++ standard will do. As I said, I couldn't find WHY this is the expected
behavior. I need to understand it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102577
Bug ID: 102577
Summary: Function frame size in relation to variables in
conditional subscopes
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100231
Bug ID: 100231
Summary: [C++17] Variable template specialization inside a
class gives compilation error
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
