[Bug ipa/98265] [10/11 Regression] gcc-10 has significantly worse code generated with -O2 compared to -O1 (or gcc-9 -O2) when using the Eigen C++ library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98265 --- Comment #3 from Kartik Mohta --- This is a simple example to demonstrate the problem I've noticed in a bigger program. Do the inlining limits depend on the size of the TU?

[Bug ipa/98265] gcc-10 has significantly worse code generated with -O2 compared to -O1 (or gcc-9 -O2) when using the Eigen C++ library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98265 --- Comment #1 from Kartik Mohta --- Created attachment 49755 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49755&action=edit preprocessed file

[Bug ipa/98265] New: gcc-10 has significantly worse code generated with -O2 compared to -O1 (or gcc-9 -O2) when using the Eigen C++ library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98265 Bug ID: 98265 Summary: gcc-10 has significantly worse code generated with -O2 compared to -O1 (or gcc-9 -O2) when using the Eigen C++ library Product: gcc Version