https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Oops, that what I get for doing 16 things at once. sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6)
> (In reply to Bill Long from comment #5)
> > Is this fixed in a release version of GCC?
>
> Submitting patch for approval and will backport as the fix is simple.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The folowing patch fixes this and regression tests OK.
diff --git a/libgfortran/io/transfer.c b/libgfortran/io/transfer.c
index 8ab0583dd55..27bee9d4e01 100644
--- a/libgfortran/io/transfer.c
+++ b/libgfortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I agree with your comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I found the DEC F77 reference. I wanted to capture this somewhere for future
reference:
o MESSAGE: Extension to FORTRAN-77: nonstandard FORMAT
statement item
EXPLANATION: The following format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Patch regresses several test cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97063
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97037
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89219
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97037
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jvdelisle at charter dot net
Target Milestone: ---
I discovered this while working on the EX formattting feature. The
determine_precision function is called by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
An Update. I have the front end and runtime parsing for OUTPUT done and am now
looking at the actual implementation. We have the printf series of functions
available and can use the %A format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
Interesting language if not sort of weird:
"exp is a binary exponent expressed as a decimal integer"
I am in early stages of choosing how to do this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #16)
> The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
>
Paul, I see you got the format just right. I stumbled on that part and then
decided
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #10)
---snip---
> Thanks for testing. Does the patch that follows fix the regressions?
> gfortran treats components and type bound procedures separately.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93733
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> This issue depends on the fix for FORALL. In gfc_match_do in the concurrent
> section, one gets to
>
> m = match_forall_header (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> This is related to PR78219.
>
> If someone takes up the challenge, then this show accept only
> standard conforming type specs. That is, INTE
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jvdelisle at charter dot net
Target Milestone: ---
F2018 provides for an optional type spec in the DO CONCURRENT construct:
R1125 concurrent-header is ( [ integer-type-spec :: ] concurrent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92643
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85796
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95546
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
On 1/26/19 1:07 PM, anlauf at gmx dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89020
>
> Harald Anlauf changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
On 11/14/2016 11:09 AM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78351
>
> kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78152
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
On 11/01/2016 01:45 PM, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote:
--- snip ---
> Fortunately, I use FreeBSD as my operating system, which
> unfortunately limits me to gfortran. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
On 10/11/2016 10:21 PM, damian at sourceryinstitute dot org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77903
>
> --- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson ---
> Check the date o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #27 from jvdelisle at charter dot net 2011-06-06 12:36:21 UTC ---
>
> print "(-2pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.002E+01
> print "(-1pg12.3)", 0.02 ! 0.200E-01 expected 0.020E+00
> print "
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #25 from jvdelisle at charter dot net 2011-06-06 12:09:48 UTC ---
On 06/06/2011 01:38 AM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote:
> For a scale factor 0, we are done. Good work, thank you!
>
> A scale factor != 0 does not
37 matches
Mail list logo
